AMAT vs. ANET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and ANET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT (131.76 billion USD) and ANET (116.08 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
AMAT at 1.71 and ANET at 1.39 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AMAT | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Arista Networks, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 92.43 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 116.08 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.705 | 1.387 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | June 6, 2014 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and ANET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and ANET, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 38.46 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 2.11 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 15.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 11.51 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 30.67 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 35.66 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 15.36 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 30.18 |
Dividend Comparison
AMAT’s 0.99% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike ANET, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits AMAT’s balanced approach against ANET’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | AMAT | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and ANET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ANET’s interest coverage comes up “--”, reflecting interest demands so faint they’re barely there—likely minimal debt or tiny rates—whereas AMAT at 0.00 cruises past interest with ease.
| Symbol | AMAT | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 3.93 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 3.31 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -- |