ALNY vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALNY and TEM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ALNY dominates in value with a market cap of 38.15 billion USD, eclipsing TEM’s 9.77 billion USD by roughly 3.90×.
TEM carries a higher beta at 7.68, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALNY remains steadier at 0.17.
| Symbol | ALNY | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Tempus AI, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| CEO | Dr. Yvonne L. Greenstreet M.B.A., M.D. | Mr. Eric P. Lefkofsky |
| Price | 292.58 USD | 58.14 USD |
| Market Cap | 38.15 billion USD | 9.77 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.17 | 7.68 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 1, 2004 | March 28, 2012 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALNY and TEM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALNY and TEM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither ALNY nor TEM turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -140.68 and -13.98, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- ALNY posts a negative forward PEG of -38.16, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas TEM at 0.14 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- ALNY and TEM both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -506.05 and -45.95, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | ALNY | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -140.68 | -13.98 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -38.16 | 0.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 16.25 | 12.16 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 328.68 | 30.39 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -506.05 | -45.95 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -251.73 | -16.45 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 16.37 | 13.04 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -509.80 | -49.27 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ALNY nor TEM currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ALNY | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALNY and TEM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ALNY is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 11.28), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while TEM at 2.63 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
- Both ALNY and TEM report negative interest coverage ratios (-0.79, -12.09), meaning EBIT itself is negative—neither can cover interest, a critical solvency warning.
| Symbol | ALNY | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.04 | 1.71 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 2.98 | 1.56 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 11.28 | 2.63 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.31 | 0.56 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.79 | -12.09 |