ALNY vs. NVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

NVS stands out with 222.75 billion USD in market value—about 5.84× ALNY’s market cap of 38.15 billion USD.

NVS carries a higher beta at 0.53, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALNY remains steadier at 0.17.

NVS is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike ALNY, which is purely domestic.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ALNY and NVS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALNY and NVS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• ALNY posts a negative P/E of -140.68, reflecting last year’s net loss, while NVS at 17.13 signals healthy earnings.
• ALNY posts a negative forward PEG of -38.16, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas NVS at 2.70 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
• ALNY has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -506.05, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, NVS (P/FCF 13.20) indicates positive free cash flow generation.

Dividend Comparison

ALNY offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while NVS provides a 3.79% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ALNY and NVS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• NVS’s current ratio of 0.79 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ALNY at 3.04 maintains healthy liquidity.
• NVS posts a quick ratio of 0.61, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ALNY at 2.98 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
• ALNY is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 11.28), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while NVS at 0.81 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
• With negative EBIT (-0.79), ALNY cannot cover its interest payments. NVS, with an interest coverage of 20.17, meets its interest obligations.