ALNY vs. MCK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALNY and MCK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MCK stands out with 89.92 billion USD in market value—about 2.36× ALNY’s market cap of 38.15 billion USD.
MCK carries a higher beta at 0.52, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALNY remains steadier at 0.17.
Symbol | ALNY | MCK |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | McKesson Corporation |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Distribution |
CEO | Dr. Yvonne L. Greenstreet M.B.A., M.D. | Mr. Brian S. Tyler Ph.D. |
Price | 292.58 USD | 718.73 USD |
Market Cap | 38.15 billion USD | 89.92 billion USD |
Beta | 0.17 | 0.52 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | June 1, 2004 | November 10, 1994 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALNY and MCK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALNY and MCK based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALNY posts a negative P/E of -140.68, reflecting last year’s net loss, while MCK at 27.31 signals healthy earnings.
- ALNY posts a negative forward PEG of -38.16, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas MCK at 2.10 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- MCK carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -43.39, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ALNY (P/B 328.68) has positive book value.
- ALNY has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -506.05, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, MCK (P/FCF 16.03) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
Symbol | ALNY | MCK |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -140.68 | 27.31 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -38.16 | 2.10 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 16.25 | 0.25 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 328.68 | -43.39 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -506.05 | 16.03 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -251.73 | 17.85 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 16.37 | 0.26 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -509.80 | 16.33 |
Dividend Comparison
ALNY offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MCK provides a 0.38% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
Symbol | ALNY | MCK |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.38% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALNY and MCK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- MCK’s current ratio of 0.90 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ALNY at 3.04 maintains healthy liquidity.
- MCK posts a quick ratio of 0.53, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ALNY at 2.98 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ALNY carries high leverage (debt-to-equity ratio 11.28), whereas MCK has negative equity (-3.56), each presenting distinct capital-structure concerns.
- With negative EBIT (-0.79), ALNY cannot cover its interest payments. MCK, with an interest coverage of 25.45, meets its interest obligations.
Symbol | ALNY | MCK |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.04 | 0.90 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 2.98 | 0.53 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 11.28 | -3.56 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.31 | 0.10 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.79 | 25.45 |