ALNY vs. IRTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ALNY’s market capitalization of 39.32 billion USD is substantially larger than IRTC’s 4.76 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

IRTC carries a higher beta at 1.41, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALNY (beta: 0.21) exhibits greater stability.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ALNY and IRTC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of ALNY and IRTC. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

• ALNY’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -145.01 and IRTC’s P/E ratio of -47.86 both indicate negative earnings. For ALNY, this signifies current unprofitability, raising questions about its operational efficiency or market conditions. IRTC’s negative P/E also reflects a lack of current earnings, a key concern for its financial health and investor appeal.
• ALNY’s Forward PEG ratio of -39.33 and IRTC’s Forward PEG ratio of -3.48 are both in the negative range. For ALNY, a negative PEG ratio often stems from negative current earnings or forecasts of declining earnings, making its valuation difficult to assess relative to growth. Similarly, IRTC’s negative PEG suggests underlying issues with profitability or growth expectations, raising questions about its stock price compared to future prospects.
• ALNY’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 338.80 and IRTC’s P/B ratio of 54.30 are both very high. For ALNY, this typically means the market assigns a much greater value to the company than its net accounting worth, often due to factors like robust intangible assets or superior growth prospects. IRTC’s high P/B also suggests investors have high expectations for its future performance and are pricing it well above its book value.

Dividend Comparison

Neither ALNY nor IRTC currently pays a dividend; this often suggests they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of ALNY and IRTC. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

• ALNY’s Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio of 11.28 and IRTC’s D/E ratio of 8.49 are both very high. ALNY’s high leverage suggests an aggressive financial posture that could be risky, especially in volatile market conditions. Similarly, IRTC’s significant debt burden may pressure its financial flexibility and debt servicing capacity.
• ALNY’s Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) of -0.79 and IRTC’s ICR of -16.44 are both negative. For ALNY, a negative ICR means its operating earnings are insufficient to cover its interest expenses, a critical indicator of financial distress. IRTC’s negative ICR likewise signals severe difficulty in servicing its debt and raises concerns about its ongoing financial stability.