Seek Returns logo

ALLE vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALLE and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ALLE’s market capitalization stands at 12.74 billion USD, while GFL’s is 17.21 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.03 for ALLE and 1.01 for GFL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolALLEGFL
Company NameAllegion plcGFL Environmental Inc.
CountryIECA
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustrySecurity & Protection ServicesWaste Management
CEOJohn H. StonePatrick Dovigi
Price148.11 USD48.49 USD
Market Cap12.74 billion USD17.21 billion USD
Beta1.031.01
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 18, 2013March 3, 2020
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALLE and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALLE vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALLE

40.75%

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
59.45%
Q3
25.79%
Median
15.13%
Q1
2.33%
Min
-21.67%

In the upper quartile for the Security & Protection Services industry, ALLE’s Return on Equity of 40.75% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFL

40.07%

Waste Management Industry

Max
40.07%
Q3
22.07%
Median
11.65%
Q1
-3.10%
Min
-27.58%

In the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry, GFL’s Return on Equity of 40.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALLE

17.73%

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
25.01%
Q3
14.14%
Median
7.10%
Q1
-2.34%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Security & Protection Services industry, ALLE’s Return on Invested Capital of 17.73% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

GFL

-0.09%

Waste Management Industry

Max
9.07%
Q3
7.95%
Median
3.52%
Q1
1.30%
Min
-4.75%

GFL has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.09%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALLE

16.28%

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
25.00%
Q3
15.90%
Median
11.58%
Q1
1.17%
Min
-4.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.28% places ALLE in the upper quartile for the Security & Protection Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL

37.53%

Waste Management Industry

Max
12.88%
Q3
11.97%
Median
6.76%
Q1
-0.76%
Min
-9.89%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 37.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Waste Management industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALLE

21.07%

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
27.64%
Q3
22.23%
Median
14.81%
Q1
8.71%
Min
-4.91%

ALLE’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.07% is around the midpoint for the Security & Protection Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFL

-0.27%

Waste Management Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
13.63%
Median
7.87%
Q1
1.29%
Min
-5.01%

GFL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALLEGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)40.75%40.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.63%14.69%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)17.73%-0.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.28%37.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.07%-0.27%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.49%19.37%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALLE

2.17

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.55
Median
1.87
Q1
1.36
Min
0.77

ALLE’s Current Ratio of 2.17 aligns with the median group of the Security & Protection Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFL

0.82

Waste Management Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.98
Median
1.06
Q1
0.79
Min
0.66

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Waste Management industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALLE

1.24

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.30
Median
0.53
Q1
0.15
Min
0.03

ALLE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.24 is typical for the Security & Protection Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFL

0.93

Waste Management Industry

Max
2.64
Q3
1.57
Median
1.12
Q1
0.87
Min
0.07

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Waste Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALLE

7.76

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
11.76
Q3
10.76
Median
4.76
Q1
1.85
Min
1.60

ALLE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Security & Protection Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.03

Waste Management Industry

Max
6.06
Q3
5.49
Median
2.34
Q1
0.26
Min
-2.04

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.03. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALLEGFL
Current Ratio (TTM)2.170.82
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.510.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.240.93
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.440.38
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.596.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.76-0.03

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALLE and GFL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALLE

1.34%

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
11.81%
Q3
1.96%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALLE’s Dividend Yield of 1.34% is consistent with its peers in the Security & Protection Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL

0.12%

Waste Management Industry

Max
1.38%
Q3
0.73%
Median
0.06%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is consistent with its peers in the Waste Management industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALLE

27.04%

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
219.43%
Q3
30.32%
Median
26.81%
Q1
14.53%
Min
0.00%

ALLE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.04% is within the typical range for the Security & Protection Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL

1.04%

Waste Management Industry

Max
49.31%
Q3
43.13%
Median
17.31%
Q1
0.26%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 1.04% is within the typical range for the Waste Management industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALLEGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.34%0.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.04%1.04%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALLE

20.55

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
23.62
Q3
23.52
Median
21.47
Q1
17.28
Min
13.23

ALLE’s P/E Ratio of 20.55 is within the middle range for the Security & Protection Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

8.66

Waste Management Industry

Max
76.31
Q3
66.40
Median
35.51
Q1
32.40
Min
9.07

GFL’s P/E Ratio of 8.66 is below the typical range for the Waste Management industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALLE

2.13

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
2.08
Median
2.07
Q1
0.75
Min
0.22

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.13 places ALLE in the upper quartile for the Security & Protection Services industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

GFL

0.19

Waste Management Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
4.74
Median
2.97
Q1
0.85
Min
0.06

In the lower quartile for the Waste Management industry, GFL’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.19 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALLE

3.34

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
5.83
Q3
3.54
Median
2.24
Q1
1.37
Min
0.47

ALLE’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Security & Protection Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GFL

3.03

Waste Management Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.49
Median
3.59
Q1
1.82
Min
0.31

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Waste Management industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALLE

7.95

Security & Protection Services Industry

Max
11.67
Q3
7.86
Median
4.17
Q1
2.20
Min
0.79

ALLE’s P/B Ratio of 7.95 is in the upper tier for the Security & Protection Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFL

3.08

Waste Management Industry

Max
10.62
Q3
6.13
Median
4.78
Q1
2.85
Min
1.68

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.08 is within the conventional range for the Waste Management industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ALLE vs. GFL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Security & Protection Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALLEGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)20.558.66
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.130.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.343.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.953.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)19.8698.29
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.0726.30
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.733.94