ALL vs. PYPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALL and PYPL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ALL (54.37 billion USD) and PYPL (69.68 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
PYPL dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 1.51, while ALL keeps it calmer at 0.32.
| Symbol | ALL | PYPL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | The Allstate Corporation | PayPal Holdings, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Financial - Credit Services |
| CEO | Mr. Thomas Joseph Wilson II | Mr. Alex Chriss |
| Price | 205.31 USD | 71.65 USD |
| Market Cap | 54.37 billion USD | 69.68 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.316 | 1.511 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 3, 1993 | July 6, 2015 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALL and PYPL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ALL and PYPL, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ALL | PYPL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 13.42 | 15.54 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.96 | 1.35 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.83 | 2.19 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.46 | 3.49 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.06 | 11.68 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 10.99 | 10.45 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.82 | 2.31 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 5.97 | 12.34 |
Dividend Comparison
ALL’s 1.83% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike PYPL, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ALL’s balanced approach against PYPL’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ALL | PYPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.83% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALL and PYPL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ALL posts a current ratio of 0.00 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to PYPL, sitting at 1.30, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- ALL’s quick ratio sits at 0.00 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, PYPL lands at 1.30, with enough liquidity to spare.
| Symbol | ALL | PYPL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 17.36 | 19.52 |