ALL vs. ICE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALL and ICE, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ICE stands out with 100.22 billion USD in market value—about 1.84× ALL’s market cap of 54.37 billion USD.
ICE carries a higher beta at 1.13, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALL remains steadier at 0.32.
| Symbol | ALL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | The Allstate Corporation | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| CEO | Mr. Thomas Joseph Wilson II | Mr. Jeffrey C. Sprecher |
| Price | 205.31 USD | 174.72 USD |
| Market Cap | 54.37 billion USD | 100.22 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.32 | 1.13 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 3, 1993 | November 16, 2005 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALL and ICE over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ALL and ICE, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ALL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 13.42 | 36.02 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.96 | 3.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.83 | 8.32 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.46 | 3.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.06 | 25.30 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 10.99 | 19.57 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.82 | 9.97 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 5.97 | 30.31 |
Dividend Comparison
ALL’s dividend yield of 1.83% is about 75% higher than ICE’s 1.05%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ALL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.83% | 1.05% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALL and ICE, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 1.00, both ALL and ICE have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- ALL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ICE at 1.00 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | ALL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 17.36 | 5.12 |