ALHC vs. ZTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALHC and ZTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ZTS stands out with 71.87 billion USD in market value—about 23.70× ALHC’s market cap of 3.03 billion USD.
With betas of 1.33 for ALHC and 0.94 for ZTS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ALHC | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Alignment Healthcare, Inc. | Zoetis Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| CEO | Mr. John E. Kao | Ms. Kristin C. Peck |
| Price | 15.33 USD | 161.44 USD |
| Market Cap | 3.03 billion USD | 71.87 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.33 | 0.94 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 26, 2021 | February 1, 2013 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALHC and ZTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALHC and ZTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALHC posts a negative P/E of -32.75, reflecting last year’s net loss, while ZTS at 28.70 signals healthy earnings.
- ALHC posts a negative forward PEG of -1.11, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas ZTS at 2.96 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | ALHC | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -32.75 | 28.70 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.11 | 2.96 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.01 | 7.74 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 27.45 | 15.52 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 159.00 | 31.51 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -64.47 | 19.31 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.86 | 8.28 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 136.01 | 33.71 |
Dividend Comparison
ALHC offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while ZTS provides a 1.15% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ALHC | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.15% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALHC and ZTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With negative EBIT (-2.98), ALHC cannot cover its interest payments. ZTS, with an interest coverage of 15.55, meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ALHC | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 1.74 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 1.04 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 1.45 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.48 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -2.98 | 15.55 |