ALHC vs. ISRG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALHC and ISRG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ISRG stands out with 196.08 billion USD in market value—about 64.65× ALHC’s market cap of 3.03 billion USD.
With betas of 1.33 for ALHC and 1.70 for ISRG, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ALHC | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Alignment Healthcare, Inc. | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| CEO | Mr. John E. Kao | Dr. Gary S. Guthart Ph.D. |
| Price | 15.33 USD | 547.07 USD |
| Market Cap | 3.03 billion USD | 196.08 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.33 | 1.70 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 26, 2021 | June 16, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALHC and ISRG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALHC and ISRG based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALHC posts a negative P/E of -32.75, reflecting last year’s net loss, while ISRG at 78.99 signals healthy earnings.
- ALHC posts a negative forward PEG of -1.11, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas ISRG at 5.02 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | ALHC | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -32.75 | 78.99 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.11 | 5.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.01 | 22.50 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 27.45 | 11.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 159.00 | 112.35 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -64.47 | 64.49 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.86 | 22.20 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 136.01 | 110.87 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ALHC nor ISRG currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ALHC | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALHC and ISRG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ALHC has negative EBIT (interest coverage -2.98), unable to cover interest, while ISRG shows “--” (negligible interest expense).
| Symbol | ALHC | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 4.98 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 3.97 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -2.98 | -- |