ALHC vs. BSX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALHC and BSX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BSX stands out with 154.81 billion USD in market value—about 51.04× ALHC’s market cap of 3.03 billion USD.
ALHC’s beta of 1.33 points to much larger expected swings compared to BSX’s calmer 0.69, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ALHC | BSX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Alignment Healthcare, Inc. | Boston Scientific Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Devices |
| CEO | Mr. John E. Kao | Mr. Michael F. Mahoney |
| Price | 15.33 USD | 104.64 USD |
| Market Cap | 3.03 billion USD | 154.81 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.33 | 0.69 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 26, 2021 | May 19, 1992 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALHC and BSX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALHC and BSX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALHC posts a negative P/E of -32.75, reflecting last year’s net loss, while BSX at 76.07 signals healthy earnings.
- ALHC posts a negative forward PEG of -1.11, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas BSX at 6.65 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | ALHC | BSX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -32.75 | 76.07 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.11 | 6.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.01 | 8.82 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 27.45 | 6.96 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 159.00 | 53.88 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -64.47 | 40.53 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.86 | 9.45 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 136.01 | 57.71 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ALHC nor BSX currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ALHC | BSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALHC and BSX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With negative EBIT (-2.98), ALHC cannot cover its interest payments. BSX, with an interest coverage of 13.03, meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ALHC | BSX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 0.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 0.53 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.29 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -2.98 | 13.03 |