Seek Returns logo

ALB vs. PPG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALB and PPG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolALBPPG
Company NameAlbemarle CorporationPPG Industries, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsChemicals
Market Capitalization9.19 billion USD25.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 22, 1994March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALB and PPG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALB vs. PPG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolALBPPG
5-Day Price Return-4.06%0.10%
13-Week Price Return31.87%-1.93%
26-Week Price Return-1.43%-4.97%
52-Week Price Return-5.63%-9.08%
Month-to-Date Return15.14%6.22%
Year-to-Date Return-9.25%-6.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.29M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.08M1.85M
3-Month Volatility60.63%25.30%
Beta1.691.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ALB

-9.19%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

ALB has a negative Return on Equity of -9.19%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PPG

13.91%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, PPG’s Return on Equity of 13.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ALB

-18.61%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

ALB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -18.61%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PPG

6.25%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

PPG’s Net Profit Margin of 6.25% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ALB

-20.78%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

ALB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -20.78%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PPG

10.67%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

PPG’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.67% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALBPPG
Return on Equity (TTM)-9.19%13.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)-5.44%4.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-18.61%6.25%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-20.78%10.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.76%36.90%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ALB

2.31

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

ALB’s Current Ratio of 2.31 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PPG

1.42

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

PPG’s Current Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ALB

0.35

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, ALB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PPG

0.97

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

PPG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ALB

-6.46

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

ALB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.46. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PPG

43.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

PPG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALBPPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.311.42
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.471.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.350.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-6.4643.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

ALB vs. PPG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ALB vs. PPG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ALB

3.88%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

ALB’s Dividend Yield of 3.88% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PPG

2.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

PPG’s Dividend Yield of 2.46% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ALB

192.00%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

At 192.00%, ALB’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

PPG

36.17%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

PPG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.17% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALBPPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.88%2.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)192.00%36.17%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ALB

--

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

P/E Ratio data for ALB is currently unavailable.

PPG

25.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

PPG’s P/E Ratio of 25.14 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ALB

1.84

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

ALB’s P/S Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PPG

1.57

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

PPG’s P/S Ratio of 1.57 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ALB

0.72

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

ALB’s P/B Ratio of 0.72 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PPG

3.41

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

PPG’s P/B Ratio of 3.41 is in the upper tier for the Chemicals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ALB vs. PPG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALBPPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--25.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.841.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.723.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.3524.58