ALB vs. CTVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALB and CTVA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CTVA stands out with 47.04 billion USD in market value—about 7.08× ALB’s market cap of 6.64 billion USD.
ALB’s beta of 1.71 points to much larger expected swings compared to CTVA’s calmer 0.72, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Albemarle Corporation | Corteva, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural Inputs |
| CEO | Mr. Jerry Kent Masters Jr. | Mr. Charles Victor Magro B.Sc. (Chem), MBA |
| Price | 56.44 USD | 68.96 USD |
| Market Cap | 6.64 billion USD | 47.04 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 0.72 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | February 22, 1994 | May 24, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALB and CTVA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALB and CTVA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALB posts a negative P/E of -5.82, reflecting last year’s net loss, while CTVA at 41.43 signals healthy earnings.
- ALB has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -47.57, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, CTVA (P/FCF 22.38) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -5.82 | 41.43 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 31.25 | 2.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.30 | 2.79 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 0.66 | 1.94 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -47.57 | 22.38 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -10.79 | 16.26 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1.72 | 2.92 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -62.77 | 23.37 |
Dividend Comparison
ALB’s dividend yield of 2.86% is about 195% higher than CTVA’s 0.97%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 0.97% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALB and CTVA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With negative EBIT (-9.99), ALB cannot cover its interest payments. CTVA, with an interest coverage of 9.92, meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 1.44 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.26 | 1.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.36 | 0.17 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -9.99 | 9.92 |