ALB vs. CTVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at ALB and CTVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Overview
CTVA’s market capitalization of 52.61 billion USD is significantly greater than ALB’s 7.91 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
ALB’s beta of 1.61 points to significantly higher volatility compared to CTVA (beta: 0.75), suggesting ALB has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Albemarle Corporation | Corteva, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural Inputs |
| CEO | Jerry Kent Masters Jr. | Charles Victor Magro (Chem), MBA |
| Price | 67.21 USD | 77.12 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.91 billion USD | 52.61 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.61 | 0.75 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | February 22, 1994 | May 24, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of ALB and CTVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Profitability
Return on Equity
ALB
-11.01%
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 34.45%
- Q3
- 15.78%
- Median
- 7.65%
- Q1
- 2.96%
- Min
- -12.04%
ALB has a negative Return on Equity of -11.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
CTVA
4.65%
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 7.27%
- Q3
- 7.27%
- Median
- 4.65%
- Q1
- 2.14%
- Min
- 2.14%
CTVA’s Return on Equity of 4.65% is on par with the norm for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Return on Invested Capital
ALB
-8.62%
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 20.22%
- Q3
- 10.99%
- Median
- 5.25%
- Q1
- 3.06%
- Min
- -8.62%
ALB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -8.62%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.
CTVA
5.03%
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 11.45%
- Q3
- 9.49%
- Median
- 5.13%
- Q1
- 2.30%
- Min
- 1.24%
CTVA’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.03% is in line with the norm for the Agricultural Inputs industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.
Net Profit Margin
ALB
-22.39%
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 23.23%
- Q3
- 10.64%
- Median
- 5.14%
- Q1
- 0.64%
- Min
- -8.93%
ALB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.39%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
CTVA
6.77%
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 13.95%
- Q3
- 7.95%
- Median
- 5.66%
- Q1
- 2.06%
- Min
- 1.04%
CTVA’s Net Profit Margin of 6.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Agricultural Inputs industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin
ALB
-25.05%
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 26.42%
- Q3
- 15.81%
- Median
- 10.07%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -7.44%
ALB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -25.05%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
CTVA
13.44%
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 23.04%
- Q3
- 14.70%
- Median
- 11.01%
- Q1
- 7.11%
- Min
- 3.65%
CTVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.44% is around the midpoint for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -11.01% | 4.65% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | -6.71% | 2.71% |
| Return on Invested Capital (TTM) | -8.62% | 5.03% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | -22.39% | 6.77% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | -25.05% | 13.44% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 3.53% | 44.63% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio
ALB
2.11
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 3.95
- Q3
- 2.60
- Median
- 2.04
- Q1
- 1.60
- Min
- 0.77
ALB’s Current Ratio of 2.11 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
CTVA
1.44
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 2.59
- Q3
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 1.44
- Min
- 1.12
CTVA’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
ALB
0.36
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 1.65
- Q3
- 1.10
- Median
- 0.73
- Q1
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.01
Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, ALB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
CTVA
0.17
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 0.91
- Q3
- 0.65
- Median
- 0.42
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.01
Falling into the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry, CTVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio
ALB
-9.99
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 13.69
- Q3
- 9.06
- Median
- 5.24
- Q1
- 1.68
- Min
- -3.09
ALB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.99. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
CTVA
9.92
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 4.73
- Q3
- 4.73
- Median
- 3.51
- Q1
- 1.95
- Min
- 1.30
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.92, CTVA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 1.44 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.26 | 1.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.36 | 0.17 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.10 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | -2.61 | 0.69 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -9.99 | 9.92 |
Growth
The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALB and CTVA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.
Revenue Growth
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Free Cash Flow Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield
ALB
2.41%
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 9.19%
- Q3
- 2.44%
- Median
- 1.46%
- Q1
- 0.25%
- Min
- 0.00%
ALB’s Dividend Yield of 2.41% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
CTVA
0.88%
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 8.05%
- Q3
- 5.41%
- Median
- 3.73%
- Q1
- 2.20%
- Min
- 0.00%
CTVA’s Dividend Yield of 0.88% is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
Dividend Payout Ratio
ALB
-31.01%
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 163.70%
- Q3
- 57.04%
- Median
- 30.02%
- Q1
- 12.51%
- Min
- 0.00%
ALB has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -31.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.
CTVA
10.18%
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 424.10%
- Q3
- 73.93%
- Median
- 66.58%
- Q1
- 26.42%
- Min
- 0.00%
CTVA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.18% is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.41% | 0.88% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | -31.01% | 10.18% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio
ALB
-6.93
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 56.68
- Q3
- 33.75
- Median
- 23.45
- Q1
- 16.09
- Min
- 7.50
ALB has a negative P/E Ratio of -6.93. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.
CTVA
46.33
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 53.97
- Q3
- 47.01
- Median
- 26.38
- Q1
- 15.38
- Min
- 11.48
CTVA’s P/E Ratio of 46.33 is within the middle range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Forward P/E to Growth Ratio
ALB
37.21
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 6.58
- Q3
- 3.23
- Median
- 1.64
- Q1
- 0.96
- Min
- 0.16
ALB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 37.21 is exceptionally high for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.
CTVA
2.98
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 6.44
- Q3
- 5.70
- Median
- 2.87
- Q1
- 1.84
- Min
- 0.52
The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Agricultural Inputs industry.
Price-to-Sales Ratio
ALB
1.55
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 3.76
- Q3
- 2.31
- Median
- 1.38
- Q1
- 0.89
- Min
- 0.16
ALB’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
CTVA
3.13
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 2.41
- Q3
- 1.73
- Median
- 1.30
- Q1
- 1.11
- Min
- 1.01
With a P/S Ratio of 3.13, CTVA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Agricultural Inputs industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio
ALB
0.79
Chemicals - Specialty Industry
- Max
- 6.73
- Q3
- 3.78
- Median
- 1.56
- Q1
- 1.27
- Min
- 0.35
ALB’s P/B Ratio of 0.79 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.
CTVA
2.17
Agricultural Inputs Industry
- Max
- 3.21
- Q3
- 2.35
- Median
- 1.36
- Q1
- 1.13
- Min
- 0.95
CTVA’s P/B Ratio of 2.17 is within the conventional range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | ALB | CTVA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -6.93 | 46.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 37.21 | 2.98 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.55 | 3.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 0.79 | 2.17 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -56.65 | 25.03 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -12.35 | 18.10 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1.97 | 3.25 |