Seek Returns logo

ALB vs. CRH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALB and CRH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

CRH’s market capitalization of 64.18 billion USD is significantly greater than ALB’s 7.91 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.61 for ALB and 1.22 for CRH, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolALBCRH
Company NameAlbemarle CorporationCRH plc
CountryUSIE
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyConstruction Materials
CEOJerry Kent Masters Jr.Jim Mintern
Price67.21 USD94.94 USD
Market Cap7.91 billion USD64.18 billion USD
Beta1.611.22
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateFebruary 22, 1994July 13, 1989
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALB and CRH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALB vs. CRH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALB

-11.01%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
34.45%
Q3
15.78%
Median
7.65%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-12.04%

ALB has a negative Return on Equity of -11.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CRH

15.42%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
32.32%
Q3
20.74%
Median
15.42%
Q1
12.55%
Min
11.55%

CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.42% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALB

-8.62%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
10.99%
Median
5.25%
Q1
3.06%
Min
-8.62%

ALB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -8.62%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

CRH

8.38%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
15.45%
Q3
12.02%
Median
9.68%
Q1
7.11%
Min
7.02%

CRH’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.38% is in line with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALB

-22.39%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
23.23%
Q3
10.64%
Median
5.14%
Q1
0.64%
Min
-8.93%

ALB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.39%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CRH

9.19%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
20.50%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.94%
Q1
9.16%
Min
4.73%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALB

-25.05%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
26.42%
Q3
15.81%
Median
10.07%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-7.44%

ALB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -25.05%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRH

13.73%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
26.51%
Q3
22.33%
Median
18.96%
Q1
12.92%
Min
6.22%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALBCRH
Return on Equity (TTM)-11.01%15.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)-6.71%6.33%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-8.62%8.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-22.39%9.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-25.05%13.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.53%35.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALB

2.11

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
2.60
Median
2.04
Q1
1.60
Min
0.77

ALB’s Current Ratio of 2.11 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRH

1.63

Construction Materials Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.73
Median
2.25
Q1
1.63
Min
0.87

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALB

0.36

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.10
Median
0.73
Q1
0.55
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, ALB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRH

0.80

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.88
Q3
0.71
Median
0.53
Q1
0.21
Min
0.01

CRH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction Materials industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALB

-9.99

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
13.69
Q3
9.06
Median
5.24
Q1
1.68
Min
-3.09

ALB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.99. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRH

7.45

Construction Materials Industry

Max
32.44
Q3
18.11
Median
7.75
Q1
5.31
Min
3.30

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.45 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALBCRH
Current Ratio (TTM)2.111.63
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.261.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.360.80
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.210.33
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-2.612.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-9.997.45

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALB and CRH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALB

2.41%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
9.19%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.46%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

ALB’s Dividend Yield of 2.41% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRH

1.51%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
8.35%
Q3
1.57%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.22%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.51% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALB

-31.01%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
163.70%
Q3
57.04%
Median
30.02%
Q1
12.51%
Min
0.00%

ALB has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -31.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

CRH

29.07%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
86.74%
Q3
26.48%
Median
13.85%
Q1
4.99%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.07% is in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALBCRH
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.41%1.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)-31.01%29.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALB

-6.93

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
56.68
Q3
33.75
Median
23.45
Q1
16.09
Min
7.50

ALB has a negative P/E Ratio of -6.93. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

CRH

19.53

Construction Materials Industry

Max
37.00
Q3
25.95
Median
18.83
Q1
14.75
Min
6.99

CRH’s P/E Ratio of 19.53 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALB

37.21

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
3.23
Median
1.64
Q1
0.96
Min
0.16

ALB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 37.21 is exceptionally high for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

CRH

1.81

Construction Materials Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
2.21
Median
1.91
Q1
1.46
Min
0.48

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Construction Materials industry.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALB

1.55

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.31
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.16

ALB’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRH

1.79

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.00
Q3
3.98
Median
2.34
Q1
1.52
Min
0.50

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALB

0.79

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.78
Median
1.56
Q1
1.27
Min
0.35

ALB’s P/B Ratio of 0.79 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CRH

3.04

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.60
Q3
4.69
Median
3.33
Q1
1.80
Min
0.76

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 3.04 is within the conventional range for the Construction Materials industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ALB vs. CRH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALBCRH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-6.9319.53
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)37.211.81
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.551.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)0.793.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-56.6527.60
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-12.3511.93
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.972.17