ALB vs. CRH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALB and CRH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CRH towers over ALB with a market cap of 64.45 billion USD, roughly 9.70 times the 6.64 billion USD of its peer.
ALB at 1.71 and CRH at 1.28 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | ALB | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Albemarle Corporation | CRH plc |
| Country | US | IE |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction Materials |
| CEO | Mr. Jerry Kent Masters Jr. | Mr. Jim Mintern |
| Price | 56.44 USD | 95.08 USD |
| Market Cap | 6.64 billion USD | 64.45 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.714 | 1.279 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | February 22, 1994 | July 13, 1989 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALB and CRH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALB and CRH based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALB has a negative P/E of -5.82, indicating it’s been unprofitable over the past year with no net earnings to support its stock price. On the other hand, CRH at 22.51 has maintained positive earnings, showing a healthier profit profile.
- ALB shows a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -47.57, meaning it’s been burning through cash faster than it can produce it over the past twelve months—a troubling sign for its financial resilience. On the flip side, CRH at 22.10 has managed to keep its cash flow in positive territory.
| Symbol | ALB | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -5.82 | 22.51 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 31.25 | 2.18 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.30 | 1.91 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 0.66 | 2.99 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -47.57 | 22.10 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -10.79 | 12.93 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1.72 | 2.25 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -62.77 | 26.07 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ALB at 2.86% and CRH at 1.49% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet ALB’s 2.86% yield, 92% above CRH’s 1.49%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while CRH leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | ALB | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 1.49% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALB and CRH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ALB clocks in at -9.99 below 1.5, earnings just keeping ahead of interest—dicey if profits stumble. By contrast, CRH’s 6.95 sails through with plenty of cushion.
| Symbol | ALB | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 1.37 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.26 | 0.91 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.36 | 0.71 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.30 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -9.99 | 6.95 |