Seek Returns logo

ALAB vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALAB and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

TTWO’s market capitalization of 42.60 billion USD is significantly greater than ALAB’s 14.97 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.40 for ALAB and 1.03 for TTWO, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolALABTTWO
Company NameAstera Labs, Inc. Common StockTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEOJitendra MohanStrauss H. Zelnick
Price90.8 USD240.11 USD
Market Cap14.97 billion USD42.60 billion USD
Beta1.401.03
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 20, 2024April 15, 1997
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALAB and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALAB vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALAB

4.43%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ALAB’s Return on Equity of 4.43% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-91.27%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -91.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALAB

-4.25%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

ALAB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -4.25%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

TTWO

-64.64%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

TTWO has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -64.64%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALAB

8.44%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

ALAB’s Net Profit Margin of 8.44% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-79.50%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -79.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALAB

-4.45%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ALAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TTWO

-77.94%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -77.94%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALABTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)4.43%-91.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.69%-48.79%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-4.25%-64.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.44%-79.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.45%-77.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.76%54.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALAB

13.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ALAB’s Current Ratio of 13.92 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TTWO

0.78

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 0.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

TTWO

1.92

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.92. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

TTWO

-58.78

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -58.78. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALABTTWO
Current Ratio (TTM)13.920.78
Quick Ratio (TTM)13.260.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)--1.92
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)--0.45
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)4.76-0.76
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---58.78

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALAB and TTWO. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALABTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALAB

357.98

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 357.98, ALAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TTWO

-9.48

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

TTWO has a negative P/E Ratio of -9.48. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALAB

10.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

TTWO

-0.26

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

TTWO has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.26. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALAB

30.53

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 30.53, ALAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TTWO

7.56

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.56 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALAB

14.23

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.23, ALAB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO

19.86

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

ALAB vs. TTWO: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALABTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)357.98-9.48
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)10.80-0.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)30.537.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.2319.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)138.44-198.52
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-820.32-13.01
EV-to-Sales (TTM)30.358.03