ALAB vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALAB and RBLX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
RBLX stands out with 55.05 billion USD in market value—about 3.62× ALAB’s market cap of 15.20 billion USD.
RBLX carries a higher beta at 1.47, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALAB remains steadier at 0.33.
| Symbol | ALAB | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | Roblox Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Mr. Jitendra Mohan | Mr. David Baszucki |
| Price | 92.17 USD | 81.16 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.20 billion USD | 55.05 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.33 | 1.47 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 20, 2024 | March 10, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALAB and RBLX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALAB and RBLX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALAB trades at a lofty P/E of 363.38, implying strong growth expectations, in contrast to RBLX’s negative P/E of -61.96 driven by recent losses.
| Symbol | ALAB | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 363.38 | -61.96 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 10.90 | 1.35 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 30.99 | 14.35 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.44 | 175.46 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 140.53 | 62.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -832.77 | -90.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 30.81 | 14.52 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 139.73 | 63.51 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAB nor RBLX currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ALAB | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALAB and RBLX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- RBLX is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 5.81), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ALAB at 0.00, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ALAB shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but RBLX is in the red with interest coverage -25.09, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ALAB | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 13.92 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 13.26 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 5.81 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -25.09 |