ALAB vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALAB and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ALAB dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 15.20 billion USD—about 3.43 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.
QBTS dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 0.89, while ALAB keeps it calmer at 0.33.
| Symbol | ALAB | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | D-Wave Quantum Inc. |
| Country | US | CA |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Jitendra Mohan | Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D. |
| Price | 92.17 USD | 15.36 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.20 billion USD | 4.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.33167723 | 0.886 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 20, 2024 | December 11, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALAB and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALAB and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALAB carries a lofty P/E of 363.38, where its market price towers over its earnings from the past year—investors are paying a significant premium for each dollar of profit. In stark contrast, QBTS at -33.33 is negative, revealing a complete absence of net earnings over the same period.
- QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ALAB at 140.53 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | ALAB | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 363.38 | -33.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 10.90 | 1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 30.99 | 207.56 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.44 | 21.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 140.53 | -84.98 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -832.77 | -30.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 30.81 | 193.69 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 139.73 | -79.30 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAB nor QBTS pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | ALAB | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALAB and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ALAB’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while QBTS at -28.05 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.
| Symbol | ALAB | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 13.92 | 20.73 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 13.26 | 20.61 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -28.05 |