ALAB vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALAB and PANW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
PANW stands out with 120.01 billion USD in market value—about 7.90× ALAB’s market cap of 15.20 billion USD.
PANW carries a higher beta at 1.02, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALAB remains steadier at 0.33.
Symbol | ALAB | PANW |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
CEO | Mr. Jitendra Mohan | Mr. Nikesh Arora C.F.A. |
Price | 92.17 USD | 181.26 USD |
Market Cap | 15.20 billion USD | 120.01 billion USD |
Beta | 0.33 | 1.02 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | March 20, 2024 | July 20, 2012 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALAB and PANW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALAB and PANW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALAB stands out with a premium P/E of 363.38, while PANW at 95.26 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
- PANW shows a negative forward PEG of -0.95, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ALAB at 10.90 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
Symbol | ALAB | PANW |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 363.38 | 95.26 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 10.90 | -0.95 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 30.99 | 14.00 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.44 | 18.74 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 140.53 | 40.33 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -832.77 | 78.26 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 30.81 | 13.85 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 139.73 | 39.88 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAB nor PANW currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
Symbol | ALAB | PANW |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALAB and PANW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- PANW’s current ratio of 0.84 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ALAB at 13.92 maintains healthy liquidity.
- ALAB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas PANW (at 591.06) covers its interest obligations.
Symbol | ALAB | PANW |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 13.92 | 0.84 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 13.26 | 0.84 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.14 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.04 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 591.06 |