Seek Returns logo

ALAB vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALAB and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

NTES’s market capitalization of 84.47 billion USD is significantly greater than ALAB’s 14.97 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ALAB’s beta of 1.40 points to significantly higher volatility compared to NTES (beta: 0.85), suggesting ALAB has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

NTES is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ALAB, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolALABNTES
Company NameAstera Labs, Inc. Common StockNetEase, Inc.
CountryUSCN
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEOJitendra MohanLei Ding
Price90.8 USD132.85 USD
Market Cap14.97 billion USD84.47 billion USD
Beta1.400.85
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 20, 2024June 30, 2000
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALAB and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALAB vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALAB

4.43%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ALAB’s Return on Equity of 4.43% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTES

23.73%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

NTES’s Return on Equity of 23.73% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALAB

-4.25%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

ALAB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -4.25%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

NTES

17.02%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, NTES’s Return on Invested Capital of 17.02% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALAB

8.44%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

ALAB’s Net Profit Margin of 8.44% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTES

30.17%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

NTES’s Net Profit Margin of 30.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALAB

-4.45%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ALAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NTES

30.21%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

NTES’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALABNTES
Return on Equity (TTM)4.43%23.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.69%16.11%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-4.25%17.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.44%30.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.45%30.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.76%62.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALAB

13.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ALAB’s Current Ratio of 13.92 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NTES

3.21

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.21 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

NTES

0.07

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

At 0.07, NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio is unusually low for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This highlights a conservative capital structure, suggesting the company prioritizes financial stability over aggressive growth funded by debt.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

NTES

--

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

Interest Coverage Ratio data for NTES is currently unavailable.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALABNTES
Current Ratio (TTM)13.923.21
Quick Ratio (TTM)13.263.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)--0.07
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)--0.05
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)4.76-0.92
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALAB and NTES. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTES

1.49%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.49%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTES

36.47%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.47% is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALABNTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%36.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALAB

357.98

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 357.98, ALAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NTES

18.79

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

NTES’s P/E Ratio of 18.79 is within the middle range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALAB

10.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

NTES

2.72

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.72 places NTES in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALAB

30.53

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 30.53, ALAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTES

5.68

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALAB

14.23

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.23, ALAB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTES

4.23

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

ALAB vs. NTES: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALABNTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)357.9818.79
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)10.802.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)30.535.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.234.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)138.4415.23
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-820.3216.61
EV-to-Sales (TTM)30.355.38