ALAB vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALAB and MRVL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MRVL stands out with 51.92 billion USD in market value—about 3.42× ALAB’s market cap of 15.20 billion USD.
MRVL carries a higher beta at 1.82, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALAB remains steadier at 0.33.
| Symbol | ALAB | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Jitendra Mohan | Mr. Matthew J. Murphy |
| Price | 92.17 USD | 60.11 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.20 billion USD | 51.92 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.33 | 1.82 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 20, 2024 | June 30, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALAB and MRVL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALAB and MRVL based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALAB trades at a lofty P/E of 363.38, implying strong growth expectations, in contrast to MRVL’s negative P/E of -58.80 driven by recent losses.
- MRVL shows a negative forward PEG of -2.32, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ALAB at 10.90 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ALAB | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 363.38 | -58.80 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 10.90 | -2.32 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 30.99 | 9.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.44 | 3.88 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 140.53 | 37.35 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -832.77 | -2221.67 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 30.81 | 9.59 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 139.73 | 39.79 |
Dividend Comparison
ALAB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MRVL provides a 0.40% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ALAB | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.40% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALAB and MRVL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ALAB shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but MRVL is in the red with interest coverage -3.75, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ALAB | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 13.92 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 13.26 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -3.75 |