Seek Returns logo

ALAB vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALAB and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

IBM’s market capitalization of 271.36 billion USD is significantly greater than ALAB’s 14.97 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ALAB’s beta of 1.40 points to significantly higher volatility compared to IBM (beta: 0.65), suggesting ALAB has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolALABIBM
Company NameAstera Labs, Inc. Common StockInternational Business Machines Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsInformation Technology Services
CEOJitendra MohanArvind Krishna
Price90.8 USD291.97 USD
Market Cap14.97 billion USD271.36 billion USD
Beta1.400.65
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 20, 2024September 24, 1915
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALAB and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALAB vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALAB

4.43%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ALAB’s Return on Equity of 4.43% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IBM

21.32%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.32% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALAB

-4.25%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

ALAB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -4.25%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

IBM

8.48%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

IBM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.48% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALAB

8.44%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

ALAB’s Net Profit Margin of 8.44% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM

8.71%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALAB

-4.45%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ALAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IBM

16.36%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places IBM in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALABIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)4.43%21.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.69%3.76%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-4.25%8.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.44%8.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.45%16.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.76%57.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALAB

13.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ALAB’s Current Ratio of 13.92 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IBM

1.01

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

IBM’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

IBM

2.49

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.49. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

IBM

5.92

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALABIBM
Current Ratio (TTM)13.921.01
Quick Ratio (TTM)13.260.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)--2.49
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)--0.46
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)4.764.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--5.92

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALAB and IBM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM

2.29%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM

112.81%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 112.81% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALABIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%112.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALAB

357.98

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 357.98, ALAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IBM

49.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

At 49.51, IBM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALAB

10.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

IBM

9.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

IBM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 9.51 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALAB

30.53

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 30.53, ALAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IBM

4.32

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.32 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALAB

14.23

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.23, ALAB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IBM

10.08

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

ALAB vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALABIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)357.9849.51
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)10.809.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)30.534.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.2310.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)138.4422.73
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-820.3226.54
EV-to-Sales (TTM)30.355.21