ALAB vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALAB and FTV, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
FTV stands out with 23.83 billion USD in market value—about 1.57× ALAB’s market cap of 15.20 billion USD.
FTV carries a higher beta at 1.16, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALAB remains steadier at 0.33.
| Symbol | ALAB | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | Fortive Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Jitendra Mohan | Mr. James A. Lico |
| Price | 92.17 USD | 70.1 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.20 billion USD | 23.83 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.33 | 1.16 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 20, 2024 | July 5, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALAB and FTV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALAB and FTV based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALAB stands out with a premium P/E of 363.38, while FTV at 29.99 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
| Symbol | ALAB | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 363.38 | 29.99 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 10.90 | 2.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 30.99 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.44 | 2.34 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 140.53 | 17.13 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -832.77 | 17.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 30.81 | 4.33 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 139.73 | 19.26 |
Dividend Comparison
ALAB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while FTV provides a 0.46% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ALAB | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALAB and FTV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FTV’s current ratio of 0.99 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ALAB at 13.92 maintains healthy liquidity.
- FTV posts a quick ratio of 0.78, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ALAB at 13.26 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ALAB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FTV (at 10.46) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ALAB | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 13.92 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 13.26 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 10.46 |