Seek Returns logo

ALAB vs. CDW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALAB and CDW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolALABCDW
Company NameAstera Labs, Inc.CDW Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization33.37 billion USD20.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 20, 2024June 27, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALAB and CDW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALAB vs. CDW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolALABCDW
5-Day Price Return0.98%-1.84%
13-Week Price Return121.08%-12.55%
26-Week Price Return236.42%-0.62%
52-Week Price Return297.19%-27.39%
Month-to-Date Return2.52%-0.01%
Year-to-Date Return51.56%-8.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.17M1.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.60M1.21M
3-Month Volatility94.07%26.25%
Beta2.701.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ALAB

9.94%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

ALAB’s Return on Equity of 9.94% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CDW

45.37%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

CDW’s Return on Equity of 45.37% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ALAB

16.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

ALAB’s Net Profit Margin of 16.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CDW

4.92%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

CDW’s Net Profit Margin of 4.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ALAB

6.99%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

ALAB’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.99% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CDW

7.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

CDW’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.64% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALABCDW
Return on Equity (TTM)9.94%45.37%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.04%7.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.54%4.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.99%7.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.52%21.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ALAB

11.10

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

ALAB’s Current Ratio of 11.10 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CDW

1.35

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

CDW’s Current Ratio of 1.35 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ALAB

0.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ALAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CDW

2.28

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, CDW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ALAB

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

CDW

7.69

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

CDW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALABCDW
Current Ratio (MRQ)11.101.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)10.251.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--7.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

ALAB vs. CDW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ALAB vs. CDW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CDW

1.58%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CDW

30.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.73% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALABCDW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%30.73%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ALAB

333.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

At 333.14, ALAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CDW

19.41

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/E Ratio of 19.41 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ALAB

55.10

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

With a P/S Ratio of 55.10, ALAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CDW

0.96

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ALAB

13.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

ALAB’s P/B Ratio of 13.13 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CDW

9.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 9.53, CDW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ALAB vs. CDW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALABCDW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)333.1419.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)55.100.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.139.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)158.6120.51