AKR vs. KIM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 9, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AKR and KIM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both AKR and KIM are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

Symbol	AKR	KIM
Company Name	Acadia Realty Trust	Kimco Realty Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Real Estate	Real Estate
GICS Industry	Retail REITs	Retail REITs
Market Capitalization	2.79 billion USD	14.57 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 27, 1993	November 22, 1991
Security Type	REIT	REIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKR and KIM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKR vs. KIM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AKR	KIM
5-Day Price Return	-2.72%	-1.51%
13-Week Price Return	8.25%	1.46%
26-Week Price Return	1.13%	1.80%
52-Week Price Return	-13.15%	-5.90%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.28%	-1.51%
Year-to-Date Return	-18.50%	-8.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.72M	3.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.58M	4.05M
3-Month Volatility	21.27%	19.12%
Beta	1.17	1.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AKR

0.96%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 16.17%
Q3: 9.03%
Median: 6.12%
Q1: 3.81%
Min: -3.17%

AKR’s Return on Equity of 0.96% is in the lower quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 16.17%
Q3: 9.03%
Median: 6.12%
Q1: 3.81%
Min: -3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AKR

5.31%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 75.53%
Q3: 49.82%
Median: 28.35%
Q1: 20.68%
Min: -8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 75.53%
Q3: 49.82%
Median: 28.35%
Q1: 20.68%
Min: -8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AKR

10.44%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 102.11%
Q3: 58.14%
Median: 38.63%
Q1: 25.00%
Min: -8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 102.11%
Q3: 58.14%
Median: 38.63%
Q1: 25.00%
Min: -8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AKR	KIM
Return on Equity (TTM)	0.96%	5.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.45%	2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	5.31%	28.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	10.44%	32.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	70.01%	68.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AKR

1.60

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.07

AKR’s Current Ratio of 1.60 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AKR

0.81

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.06
Q3: 1.27
Median: 0.92
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.34

AKR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.06
Q3: 1.27
Median: 0.92
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AKR

1.15

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 4.31
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.29
Min: -0.08

In the lower quartile for the Retail REITs industry, AKR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.15 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 4.31
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.29
Min: -0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AKR	KIM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.60	1.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.67	1.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.81	0.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.15	2.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

AKR vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AKR vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AKR

3.47%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 6.92%
Q3: 5.10%
Median: 4.50%
Q1: 3.89%
Min: 2.37%

AKR’s Dividend Yield of 3.47% is in the lower quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KIM

4.83%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 6.92%
Q3: 5.10%
Median: 4.50%
Q1: 3.89%
Min: 2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.83% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AKR

436.47%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 195.40%
Q3: 125.60%
Median: 85.02%
Q1: 51.07%
Min: 12.86%

At 436.47%, AKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Retail REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 195.40%
Q3: 125.60%
Median: 85.02%
Q1: 51.07%
Min: 12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AKR	KIM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.47%	4.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	436.47%	117.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AKR

125.65

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 42.04
Q3: 28.02
Median: 21.98
Q1: 15.79
Min: 6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

KIM

24.32

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 42.04
Q3: 28.02
Median: 21.98
Q1: 15.79
Min: 6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AKR

6.68

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 13.05
Q3: 9.54
Median: 6.95
Q1: 5.59
Min: 3.06

AKR’s P/S Ratio of 6.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KIM

6.94

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 13.05
Q3: 9.54
Median: 6.95
Q1: 5.59
Min: 3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 6.94 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AKR

1.07

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.70
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.58

AKR’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.70
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKR vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AKR	KIM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	125.65	24.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.68	6.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.07	1.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	125.06	29.93