Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

RBLX’s market capitalization of 70.26 billion USD is significantly greater than AKAM’s 11.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

RBLX carries a higher beta at 1.56, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AKAM (beta: 0.77) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAKAMRBLX
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Roblox Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEOF. Thomson LeightonDavid Baszucki
Price79.48 USD103.59 USD
Market Cap11.31 billion USD70.26 billion USD
Beta0.771.56
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateOctober 29, 1999March 10, 2021
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AKAM

9.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.52% is on par with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-417.21%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -417.21%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AKAM

4.40%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AKAM’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.40% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

RBLX

-27.10%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

RBLX has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -27.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AKAM

11.26%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 11.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-22.94%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.94%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AKAM

12.97%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.97% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-26.48%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -26.48%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)9.52%-417.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.53%-11.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.40%-27.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.26%-22.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.97%-26.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.07%77.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AKAM

1.18

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RBLX

1.02

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AKAM

1.01

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RBLX

5.81

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.81, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AKAM

17.98

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.98 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RBLX

-25.09

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -25.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMRBLX
Current Ratio (TTM)1.181.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.181.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.015.81
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.460.24
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.78-1.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.98-25.09

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AKAM and RBLX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AKAM

26.17

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 26.17 is within the middle range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RBLX

-79.08

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

RBLX has a negative P/E Ratio of -79.08. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AKAM

3.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AKAM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.08 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

RBLX

1.72

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

RBLX’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is below the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This is a strong indicator that the stock may be undervalued, as its price appears low given its future growth prospects.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AKAM

2.81

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RBLX

18.32

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

With a P/S Ratio of 18.32, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AKAM

2.58

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

RBLX

223.95

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

AKAM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)26.17-79.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.081.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.8118.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.58223.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)14.3380.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.70-115.38
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.6918.49