Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and MCHP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAKAMMCHP
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Microchip Technology Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization12.73 billion USD28.36 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 29, 1999March 19, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and MCHP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. MCHP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMCHP
5-Day Price Return0.06%-5.50%
13-Week Price Return17.13%-21.14%
26-Week Price Return10.43%-14.76%
52-Week Price Return-1.78%-21.19%
Month-to-Date Return16.07%-17.17%
Year-to-Date Return-8.87%-9.85%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.36M9.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.07M8.17M
3-Month Volatility38.93%37.19%
Beta0.661.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AKAM

10.86%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 10.86% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MCHP

-2.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -2.78%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

12.26%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.26% places AKAM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MCHP

-4.39%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.39%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

15.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.00% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MCHP

1.18%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.18% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMCHP
Return on Equity (TTM)10.86%-2.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.86%-1.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%-4.39%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.00%1.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.13%54.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.28

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 2.28 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MCHP

2.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

0.87

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.87 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

85.36

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.36 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMCHP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.282.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.981.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.870.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.361.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AKAM vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP

3.58%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.58%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP

656.12%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 656.12%, MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMCHP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%656.12%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

24.74

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 24.74 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

3.03

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MCHP

6.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 6.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.30

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AKAM’s P/B Ratio of 2.30 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MCHP

5.18

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 5.18 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKAM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMCHP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.74--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.036.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.305.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3838.31