Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAKAMJBL
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization10.91 billion USD21.90 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 29, 1999May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAKAMJBL
5-Day Price Return1.39%-6.14%
13-Week Price Return-1.97%21.86%
26-Week Price Return-24.31%20.98%
52-Week Price Return-23.89%89.88%
Month-to-Date Return0.24%-8.57%
Year-to-Date Return-20.03%41.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.84M1.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.26M1.36M
3-Month Volatility25.31%32.75%
Beta0.761.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AKAM

9.07%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.07% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

10.40%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 10.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

12.85%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.85% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)9.07%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.13%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.85%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.13%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.31

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 2.31 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

0.92

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.92 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

85.36

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.36 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.310.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.980.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.922.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.3611.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AKAM vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

25.68

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 25.68 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

2.67

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.61

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

AKAM’s P/B Ratio of 2.61 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AKAM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.6837.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.670.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.6114.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.9318.82