Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. GRAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and GRAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAKAMGRAB
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Grab Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization12.73 billion USD21.91 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 29, 1999December 1, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and GRAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. GRAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGRAB
5-Day Price Return0.06%-8.31%
13-Week Price Return17.13%5.46%
26-Week Price Return10.43%7.55%
52-Week Price Return-1.78%10.63%
Month-to-Date Return16.07%-9.98%
Year-to-Date Return-8.87%14.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.36M67.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.07M46.65M
3-Month Volatility38.93%39.84%
Beta0.660.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AKAM

10.86%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 10.86% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRAB

1.90%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.90% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

12.26%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.26% places AKAM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRAB

3.78%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.78% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

15.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.00% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB

0.46%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

GRAB’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.46% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGRAB
Return on Equity (TTM)10.86%1.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.86%1.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%3.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.00%0.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.13%43.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.28

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 2.28 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GRAB

1.83

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.83 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

0.87

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.87 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRAB

0.33

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

85.36

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.36 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGRAB
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.281.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.981.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.870.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.36-3.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AKAM vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGRAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

24.74

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 24.74 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRAB

178.03

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

At 178.03, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

3.03

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRAB

6.73

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 6.73, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.30

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AKAM’s P/B Ratio of 2.30 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB

3.79

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AKAM vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGRAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.74178.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.036.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.303.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3835.66