Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. GFS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and GFS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

GFS’s market capitalization of 22.01 billion USD is significantly greater than AKAM’s 11.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

GFS carries a higher beta at 1.50, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AKAM (beta: 0.77) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAKAMGFS
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSemiconductors
CEOF. Thomson LeightonTimothy Graham Breen
Price79.48 USD39.8 USD
Market Cap11.31 billion USD22.01 billion USD
Beta0.771.50
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateOctober 29, 1999October 28, 2021
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and GFS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. GFS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AKAM

9.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.52% is on par with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GFS

-1.69%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AKAM

4.40%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AKAM’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.40% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

GFS

-2.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

GFS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -2.06%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AKAM

11.26%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 11.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GFS

-2.77%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.77%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AKAM

12.97%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.97% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFS

-3.02%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.02%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGFS
Return on Equity (TTM)9.52%-1.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.53%-1.14%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.40%-2.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.26%-2.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.97%-3.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.07%23.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AKAM

1.18

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFS

2.51

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.51 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AKAM

1.01

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AKAM

17.98

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.98 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GFS

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGFS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.182.51
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.181.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.010.15
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.460.10
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.780.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.98--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AKAM and GFS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGFS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AKAM

26.17

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 26.17 is within the middle range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFS

-117.28

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

GFS has a negative P/E Ratio of -117.28. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AKAM

3.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AKAM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.08 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

GFS

-4.79

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AKAM

2.81

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GFS

3.24

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 3.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AKAM

2.58

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

GFS

1.99

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKAM vs. GFS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMGFS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)26.17-117.28
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.08-4.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.813.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.581.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)14.3320.88
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.7016.39
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.693.25