Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

FIS’s market capitalization of 42.96 billion USD is significantly greater than AKAM’s 11.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.77 for AKAM and 1.08 for FIS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAKAMFIS
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureConsumer Electronics
CEOF. Thomson LeightonStephanie L. Ferris
Price79.48 USD81.77 USD
Market Cap11.31 billion USD42.96 billion USD
Beta0.771.08
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateOctober 29, 1999June 20, 2001
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AKAM

9.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.52% is on par with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS

5.13%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 5.13% is on par with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AKAM

4.40%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AKAM’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.40% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FIS

4.09%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

FIS’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.09% is in line with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AKAM

11.26%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 11.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIS

8.10%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AKAM

12.97%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.97% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIS

16.77%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.77% is around the midpoint for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)9.52%5.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.53%2.51%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.40%4.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.26%8.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.97%16.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.07%37.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AKAM

1.18

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS

0.63

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

FIS’s Current Ratio of 0.63 falls into the lower quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AKAM

1.01

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.80

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

FIS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AKAM

17.98

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.98 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FIS

6.73

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

FIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.180.63
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.180.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.010.80
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.460.37
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.783.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.986.73

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AKAM and FIS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

1.86%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.86%, FIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

98.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 98.30% is in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%98.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AKAM

26.17

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 26.17 is within the middle range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS

52.33

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

At 52.33, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AKAM

3.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AKAM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.08 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

FIS

7.25

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AKAM

2.81

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS

4.22

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

FIS’s P/S Ratio of 4.22 is in the upper echelon for the Consumer Electronics industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AKAM

2.58

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

FIS

2.87

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is within the conventional range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)26.1752.33
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.087.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.814.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.582.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)14.3327.23
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.7015.75
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.695.32