Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAKAMFIS
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization11.22 billion USD36.44 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 29, 1999June 20, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
5-Day Price Return2.56%0.29%
13-Week Price Return0.49%-12.77%
26-Week Price Return2.01%-0.14%
52-Week Price Return-22.50%-13.22%
Month-to-Date Return2.57%-12.16%
Year-to-Date Return-18.17%-13.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.73M3.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.26M3.46M
3-Month Volatility25.24%26.83%
Beta0.771.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AKAM

9.07%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.07% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

10.40%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 10.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

12.85%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.85% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)9.07%0.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.13%0.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.85%17.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.13%36.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.31

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 2.31 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

0.92

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.92 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

85.36

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.36 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.310.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.980.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.920.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.366.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AKAM vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.27%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.27% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%101.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

25.68

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 25.68 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS

323.87

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 323.87, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

2.67

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS

3.52

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.61

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

AKAM’s P/B Ratio of 2.61 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKAM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.68323.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.673.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.613.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.9319.84