AKAM vs. FICO: Akamai vs. Fair Isaac Stock Comparison
How do Akamai (AKAM) and Fair Isaac (FICO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Akamai (AKAM) and Fair Isaac (FICO) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but AKAM is classified in IT Services while FICO is classified in Software.
| Profile Item | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Fair Isaac Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | IT Services | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Internet Services & Infrastructure | Application Software |
| Market Capitalization | 11.94 billion USD | 15.22 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 29, 1999 | July 22, 1987 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -2.77% | -58.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -9.48% | -9.17% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -5.72% | 12.31% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Fair Isaac (FICO) has an aggressive beta of 1.33, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Akamai (AKAM) is defensive at 0.69 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 62.11% | 63.29% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 1.33 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -51.69% | -75.13% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.75M | 759.34K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.11 | -0.99 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.17 | -1.20 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Akamai (AKAM) earns 7.85% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Fair Isaac (FICO) has no ROE this period.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
7.85%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- AKAM
- 7.85%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
- FICO
- --
Net Margin (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 32.94% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Akamai (AKAM) at 8.84%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
8.84%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- AKAM
- 8.84%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
32.94%
- Max
- 41.17%
- FICO
- 32.94%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 44.72% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Akamai (AKAM) at 9.88%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
9.88%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- AKAM
- 9.88%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
44.72%
- Max
- 46.89%
- FICO
- 44.72%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.85% | -- |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.18% | 40.99% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.84% | 32.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.88% | 44.72% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 56.39% | 86.13% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 27.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Akamai (AKAM) at 5.44% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Akamai (AKAM) at -6.12% and Fair Isaac (FICO) at 36.85% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.44% | 27.33% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.18% | 18.76% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -6.12% | 36.85% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.98% | 28.97% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Akamai (AKAM) at 2.13 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fair Isaac (FICO) at 0.99 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FICO.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
2.13
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- AKAM
- 2.13
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.99
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- FICO
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Akamai (AKAM) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.84 against its industry range, while Fair Isaac (FICO) reports no figure this period.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
1.84
- Max
- 2.52
- AKAM
- 1.84
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
FICO
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
- FICO
- --
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.13 | 0.99 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.84 | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.78 | 3.86 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Akamai (AKAM) nor Fair Isaac (FICO) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- AKAM
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FICO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Akamai (AKAM) nor Fair Isaac (FICO) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- AKAM
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FICO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Akamai (AKAM) at 32.33 and Fair Isaac (FICO) at 19.40 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
32.33
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- AKAM
- 32.33
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
FICO
Software & Services industry group
19.40
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- FICO
- 19.40
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Akamai (AKAM) at 2.72 and Fair Isaac (FICO) at 6.00 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
2.72
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- AKAM
- 2.72
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
FICO
Software & Services industry group
6.00
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FICO
- 6.00
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Fair Isaac (FICO) reports a negative P/B ratio of -3.90, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Akamai (AKAM) reports 2.32, ranking against industry peers normally.
AKAM
Software & Services industry group
2.32
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- AKAM
- 2.32
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
FICO
Software & Services industry group
-3.90
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- FICO
- -3.90
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 32.33 | 19.40 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.72 | 6.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.32 | -3.90 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.51% | 6.54% |