Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and ERIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AKAM is a standard domestic listing, while ERIC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolAKAMERIC
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
CountryUnited StatesSweden
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization10.91 billion USD25.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 29, 1999August 24, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and ERIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. ERIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
5-Day Price Return1.39%1.36%
13-Week Price Return-1.97%-10.72%
26-Week Price Return-24.31%-11.99%
52-Week Price Return-23.89%1.44%
Month-to-Date Return0.24%4.32%
Year-to-Date Return-20.03%-17.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.84M3.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.26M6.34M
3-Month Volatility25.31%26.67%
Beta0.760.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AKAM

9.07%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.07% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ERIC

19.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ERIC’s Return on Equity of 19.57% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

10.40%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 10.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ERIC

7.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

12.85%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.85% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ERIC

10.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.60% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Return on Equity (TTM)9.07%19.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.13%6.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%7.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.85%10.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.13%47.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.31

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 2.31 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ERIC

1.09

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

0.92

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.92 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERIC

0.50

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

85.36

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.36 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.311.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.980.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.920.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.363.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AKAM vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ERIC

3.73%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.73%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC

70.91%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.91% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%70.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

25.68

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 25.68 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ERIC

14.44

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 14.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

2.67

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ERIC

1.02

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.61

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

AKAM’s P/B Ratio of 2.61 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ERIC

3.15

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.15 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.6814.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.671.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.613.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.936.44