Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and ERIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ERIC’s market capitalization of 28.16 billion USD is significantly greater than AKAM’s 11.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AKAM’s beta of 0.77 points to significantly higher volatility compared to ERIC (beta: 0.44), suggesting AKAM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

ERIC is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AKAM, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAKAMERIC
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
CountryUSSE
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureCommunication Equipment
CEOF. Thomson LeightonAnthony F. Bartolo
Price79.48 USD8.54 USD
Market Cap11.31 billion USD28.16 billion USD
Beta0.770.44
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateOctober 29, 1999August 24, 1981
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and ERIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. ERIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AKAM

9.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.52% is on par with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ERIC

1.84%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ERIC’s Return on Equity of 1.84% is on par with the norm for the Communication Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AKAM

4.40%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AKAM’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.40% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ERIC

-11.25%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ERIC has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -11.25%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AKAM

11.26%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 11.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ERIC

0.65%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 0.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AKAM

12.97%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.97% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ERIC

8.83%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.83% is around the midpoint for the Communication Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Return on Equity (TTM)9.52%1.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.53%0.58%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.40%-11.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.26%0.65%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.97%8.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.07%45.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AKAM

1.18

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ERIC

1.09

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AKAM

1.01

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERIC

0.49

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.49 is typical for the Communication Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AKAM

17.98

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.98 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ERIC

6.76

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communication Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Current Ratio (TTM)1.181.09
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.180.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.010.49
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.460.15
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.78-0.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.986.76

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AKAM and ERIC. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ERIC

3.39%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.39%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communication Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC

573.48%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 573.48% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.39%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%573.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AKAM

26.17

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 26.17 is within the middle range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ERIC

169.59

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

At 169.59, ERIC’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communication Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AKAM

3.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AKAM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.08 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ERIC

-64.58

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AKAM

2.81

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ERIC

1.10

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

In the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AKAM

2.58

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ERIC

3.17

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.17 is within the conventional range for the Communication Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKAM vs. ERIC: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMERIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)26.17169.59
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.08-64.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.811.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.583.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)14.336.52
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.705.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.691.09