Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. APH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and APH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APH’s market capitalization of 120.31 billion USD is significantly greater than AKAM’s 11.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.77 for AKAM and 1.13 for APH, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAKAMAPH
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Amphenol Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOF. Thomson LeightonRichard Adam Norwitt
Price79.48 USD99.46 USD
Market Cap11.31 billion USD120.31 billion USD
Beta0.771.13
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateOctober 29, 1999November 8, 1991
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and APH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. APH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AKAM

9.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 9.52% is on par with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AKAM

4.40%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AKAM’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.40% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AKAM

11.26%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AKAM’s Net Profit Margin of 11.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AKAM

12.97%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.97% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMAPH
Return on Equity (TTM)9.52%27.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.53%11.41%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.40%15.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.26%15.58%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.97%21.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.07%33.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AKAM

1.18

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AKAM

1.01

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AKAM

17.98

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.98 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMAPH
Current Ratio (TTM)1.181.99
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.181.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.010.70
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.460.31
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.781.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.9813.97

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AKAM and APH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AKAM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMAPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%25.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AKAM

26.17

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 26.17 is within the middle range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AKAM

3.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AKAM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.08 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AKAM

2.81

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AKAM

2.58

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AKAM vs. APH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMAPH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)26.1746.05
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.084.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.817.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.5811.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)14.3354.11
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.7029.53
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.697.50