Seek Returns logo

AIZN vs. PYPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AIZN and PYPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

PYPL’s market capitalization of 74.49 billion USD is significantly greater than AIZN’s 10.23 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

PYPL carries a higher beta at 1.45, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AIZN (beta: 0.60) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAIZNPYPL
Company NameAssurant, Inc. 5.25% SubordinatPayPal Holdings, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - DiversifiedFinancial - Credit Services
CEOKeith Warner DemmingsAlex Chriss
Price20.64 USD76.59 USD
Market Cap10.23 billion USD74.49 billion USD
Beta0.601.45
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 25, 2020July 6, 2015
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AIZN and PYPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AIZN vs. PYPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AIZN

13.02%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
19.59%
Q3
17.66%
Median
12.77%
Q1
7.56%
Min
-4.43%

AIZN’s Return on Equity of 13.02% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Diversified industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PYPL

22.32%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
34.05%
Q3
18.70%
Median
10.57%
Q1
3.55%
Min
-12.12%

In the upper quartile for the Financial - Credit Services industry, PYPL’s Return on Equity of 22.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AIZN

2.09%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
32.46%
Q3
16.21%
Median
9.46%
Q1
2.09%
Min
-10.51%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Diversified industry.

PYPL

13.24%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
68.11%
Q3
32.26%
Median
9.52%
Q1
3.37%
Min
-7.03%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Credit Services industry.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AIZN

5.55%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
26.00%
Q3
19.46%
Median
9.37%
Q1
5.55%
Min
-7.05%

AIZN’s Net Profit Margin of 5.55% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance - Diversified industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PYPL

14.27%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
39.42%
Q3
20.10%
Median
12.91%
Q1
5.82%
Min
-14.80%

PYPL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.27% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial - Credit Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AIZN

6.78%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
44.52%
Q3
25.84%
Median
14.16%
Q1
6.78%
Min
-2.60%

AIZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.78% is around the midpoint for the Insurance - Diversified industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PYPL

18.13%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
77.26%
Q3
42.86%
Median
17.99%
Q1
10.82%
Min
-14.94%

PYPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.13% is around the midpoint for the Financial - Credit Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAIZNPYPL
Return on Equity (TTM)13.02%22.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.92%5.59%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.09%13.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.55%14.27%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.78%18.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.78%45.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AIZN

4.41

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
4.41
Q3
4.03
Median
2.86
Q1
2.82
Min
2.82

AIZN’s Current Ratio of 4.41 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PYPL

1.30

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.39
Median
2.62
Q1
1.06
Min
0.15

For the Financial - Credit Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AIZN

0.40

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
0.54
Q3
0.39
Median
0.27
Q1
0.21
Min
0.13

AIZN’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Insurance - Diversified industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PYPL

0.56

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
4.69
Q3
2.55
Median
1.20
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

PYPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Financial - Credit Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AIZN

7.65

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
19.23
Q3
17.46
Median
7.97
Q1
4.61
Min
-1.63

AIZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.65 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Insurance - Diversified industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PYPL

19.52

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
17.48
Q3
7.42
Median
1.59
Q1
0.38
Min
-7.77

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Credit Services industry.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAIZNPYPL
Current Ratio (TTM)4.411.30
Quick Ratio (TTM)4.411.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.400.56
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.360.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.6519.52

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AIZN and PYPL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AIZN

1.61%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
8.16%
Q3
5.54%
Median
2.46%
Q1
1.59%
Min
0.00%

AIZN’s Dividend Yield of 1.61% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Diversified industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
14.68%
Q3
2.97%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AIZN

23.78%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
101.86%
Q3
53.36%
Median
21.69%
Q1
5.33%
Min
0.00%

AIZN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.78% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Diversified industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
169.58%
Q3
38.15%
Median
18.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAIZNPYPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.61%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.78%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AIZN

14.80

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
18.52
Q3
16.13
Median
13.33
Q1
9.73
Min
2.62

AIZN’s P/E Ratio of 14.80 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PYPL

16.61

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
42.04
Q3
25.88
Median
12.28
Q1
9.55
Min
3.09

PYPL’s P/E Ratio of 16.61 is within the middle range for the Financial - Credit Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AIZN

1.18

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
2.07
Median
1.20
Q1
0.77
Min
0.04

AIZN’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.18 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Diversified industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

PYPL

1.52

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.57
Median
0.82
Q1
0.51
Min
0.06

PYPL’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.52 is within the middle range of its peers in the Financial - Credit Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AIZN

0.81

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
3.08
Q3
2.00
Median
1.15
Q1
1.07
Min
0.38

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry, AIZN’s P/S Ratio of 0.81 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PYPL

2.34

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
6.24
Q3
3.02
Median
1.54
Q1
0.75
Min
0.32

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Credit Services industry.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AIZN

1.90

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.80
Median
1.59
Q1
1.29
Min
0.74

AIZN’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PYPL

3.73

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
2.84
Median
1.28
Q1
0.84
Min
0.07

At 3.73, PYPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial - Credit Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AIZN vs. PYPL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAIZNPYPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)14.8016.61
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.181.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.812.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.903.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)6.2412.48
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)8.8511.13
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.852.46