AIG vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AIG and WFC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
WFC stands out with 238.17 billion USD in market value—about 5.00× AIG’s market cap of 47.62 billion USD.
WFC carries a higher beta at 1.12, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AIG remains steadier at 0.70.
| Symbol | AIG | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American International Group, Inc. | Wells Fargo & Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Salvatore Zaffino | Mr. Charles W. Scharf |
| Price | 82.63 USD | 73.19 USD |
| Market Cap | 47.62 billion USD | 238.17 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.70 | 1.12 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 2, 1973 | June 1, 1972 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AIG and WFC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AIG and WFC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AIG posts a negative P/E of -30.90, reflecting last year’s net loss, while WFC at 12.01 signals healthy earnings.
- AIG posts a negative forward PEG of -1.65, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas WFC at 0.66 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | AIG | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -30.90 | 12.01 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.65 | 0.66 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.75 | 3.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.43 | 1.33 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 17.65 | 57.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 8.68 | 30.50 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.01 | 4.93 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.32 | 94.96 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AIG and WFC offer similar dividend yields (1.94% vs. 2.19%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AIG | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.94% | 2.19% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AIG and WFC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.25, both AIG and WFC have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AIG (quick ratio 0.00) and WFC (quick ratio 0.25) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | AIG | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 1.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.29 | 2.50 |