AIG vs. ICE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AIG and ICE, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ICE stands out with 100.22 billion USD in market value—about 2.10× AIG’s market cap of 47.62 billion USD.
ICE carries a higher beta at 1.13, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AIG remains steadier at 0.70.
| Symbol | AIG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American International Group, Inc. | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Salvatore Zaffino | Mr. Jeffrey C. Sprecher |
| Price | 82.63 USD | 174.72 USD |
| Market Cap | 47.62 billion USD | 100.22 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.70 | 1.13 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 2, 1973 | November 16, 2005 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AIG and ICE over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AIG and ICE based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AIG posts a negative P/E of -30.90, reflecting last year’s net loss, while ICE at 36.02 signals healthy earnings.
- AIG posts a negative forward PEG of -1.65, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas ICE at 3.14 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | AIG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -30.90 | 36.02 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.65 | 3.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.75 | 8.32 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.43 | 3.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 17.65 | 25.30 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 8.68 | 19.57 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.01 | 9.97 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.32 | 30.31 |
Dividend Comparison
AIG’s dividend yield of 1.94% is about 85% higher than ICE’s 1.05%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AIG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.94% | 1.05% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AIG and ICE, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 1.00, both AIG and ICE have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AIG’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ICE at 1.00 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | AIG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.74 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.29 | 5.12 |