AGNC vs. PSA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AGNC and PSA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
PSA stands out with 51.90 billion USD in market value—about 5.78× AGNC’s market cap of 8.98 billion USD.
With betas of 1.30 for AGNC and 0.90 for PSA, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AGNC | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AGNC Investment Corp. | Public Storage |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Industrial |
| CEO | Mr. Peter J. Federico | Mr. Joseph D. Russell Jr. |
| Price | 8.8 USD | 295.86 USD |
| Market Cap | 8.98 billion USD | 51.90 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.30 | 0.90 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 15, 2008 | November 18, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AGNC and PSA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AGNC and PSA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AGNC posts a negative forward PEG of -6.57, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas PSA at 2.86 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | AGNC | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 17.19 | 26.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -6.57 | 2.86 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.32 | 10.99 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 0.80 | 5.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 34.80 | 18.49 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 34.90 | 18.11 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 84.00 | 12.93 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 351.32 | 21.74 |
Dividend Comparison
AGNC’s dividend yield of 16.36% is about 303% higher than PSA’s 4.06%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AGNC | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 16.36% | 4.06% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AGNC and PSA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.00, both AGNC and PSA have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AGNC (quick ratio 0.00) and PSA (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AGNC is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 8.30), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while PSA at 0.99 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
- AGNC’s debt-to-assets ratio of 0.87 indicates it relies heavily on debt to back its assets—potentially risky in a downturn—whereas PSA at 0.48 keeps borrowing to a more moderate level.
| Symbol | AGNC | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 8.30 | 0.99 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.87 | 0.48 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.15 | 9.54 |