Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. ZS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and ZS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ZS’s market capitalization of 49.01 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to ZS (beta: 1.09), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMZS
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Zscaler, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOMax Roth LevchinJagtar Singh Chaudhry
Price69.19 USD314.77 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD49.01 billion USD
Beta3.581.09
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021March 16, 2018
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and ZS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. ZS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ZS

-2.54%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

ZS has a negative Return on Equity of -2.54%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their ROE against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ZS

-9.81%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

ZS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -9.81%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their ROIC against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ZS

-1.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

ZS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.52%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ZS

-4.84%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

ZS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMZS
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%-2.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%-0.73%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%-9.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%-1.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%-4.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%77.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ZS

1.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

ZS’s Current Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZS

0.68

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ZS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZS

-12.23

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

ZS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -12.23. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMZS
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.24
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.091.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.68
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.23
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.75-7.62
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.24-12.23

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and ZS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZS

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZS

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMZS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ZS

-1,257.43

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

ZS has a negative P/E Ratio of -1,257.43. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ZS

-61.99

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

ZS has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -61.99. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZS

19.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 19.24, ZS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ZS

27.02

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

AFRM vs. ZS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMZS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.51-1257.43
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.16-61.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.4219.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.8027.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6367.08
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.06482.72
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.4118.94