Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. TXN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and TXN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMTXN
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Texas Instruments Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization22.71 billion USD143.42 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and TXN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. TXN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTXN
5-Day Price Return-7.33%-0.78%
13-Week Price Return-10.43%-18.11%
26-Week Price Return30.72%-15.34%
52-Week Price Return28.62%-22.55%
Month-to-Date Return-1.91%-1.32%
Year-to-Date Return15.78%-15.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.31M7.61M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.96M7.59M
3-Month Volatility67.46%26.25%
Beta3.621.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

7.75%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 7.75% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TXN

30.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, TXN’s Return on Equity of 30.41% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

6.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 6.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TXN

29.21%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.21% places TXN in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

4.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

AFRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TXN

34.33%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

An Operating Profit Margin of 34.33% places TXN in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTXN
Return on Equity (TTM)7.75%30.41%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.14%14.49%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.74%29.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.96%34.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.50%57.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TXN

4.45

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

TXN’s Current Ratio of 4.45 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

TXN

0.84

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

TXN’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.84. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

TXN

11.73

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

TXN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTXN
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.584.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.492.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.350.84
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.7611.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. TXN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. TXN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TXN

3.42%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, TXN offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TXN

98.14%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 98.14% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTXN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%98.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

96.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

At 96.53, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TXN

28.71

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

TXN’s P/E Ratio of 28.71 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

6.50

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

TXN

8.38

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

TXN’s P/S Ratio of 8.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.21

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.21 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TXN

10.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

TXN’s P/B Ratio of 10.05 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AFRM vs. TXN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTXN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)96.5328.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.508.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.2110.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2561.50