Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and TEAM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

TEAM’s market capitalization of 56.21 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to TEAM (beta: 0.97), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMTEAM
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Atlassian Corporation
CountryUSAU
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Application
CEOMax Roth LevchinMichael Cannon-Brookes
Price69.19 USD213.53 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD56.21 billion USD
Beta3.580.97
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021December 9, 2015
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and TEAM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. TEAM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TEAM

-11.49%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -11.49%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

TEAM

-5.42%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

TEAM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -5.42%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TEAM

-2.69%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.69%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TEAM

-3.34%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.34%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTEAM
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%-11.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%-2.27%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%-5.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%-2.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%-3.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%82.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TEAM

1.26

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Software - Application industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TEAM

0.90

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

TEAM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Application industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TEAM

11.22

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

TEAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.22 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTEAM
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.26
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.091.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.90
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.21
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.7531.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.2411.22

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and TEAM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEAM

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEAM

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTEAM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

TEAM

-420.02

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

TEAM has a negative P/E Ratio of -420.02. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

TEAM

4.20

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 4.20 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEAM

11.33

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 11.33 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Application industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

TEAM

40.97

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

AFRM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMTEAM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.51-420.02
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.164.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.4211.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.8040.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6338.40
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.06-1205.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.4111.04