Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AFRM is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolAFRMSONY
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization25.03 billion USD166.84 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSONY
5-Day Price Return4.16%-0.78%
13-Week Price Return51.60%9.52%
26-Week Price Return13.19%6.20%
52-Week Price Return143.38%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return13.17%11.24%
Year-to-Date Return27.41%21.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.82M13.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.55M14.18M
3-Month Volatility51.57%30.82%
Beta3.681.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

-2.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-2.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.33%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-5.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.61%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.33%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.22%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.491.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.411.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.490.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.76104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for AFRM is currently unavailable.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

8.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

5.03

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 5.03 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AFRM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--22.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.812.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.032.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.6812.66