Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. SNX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and SNX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFRM’s market capitalization of 22.30 billion USD is substantially larger than SNX’s 11.77 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to SNX (beta: 1.19), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMSNX
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.TD SYNNEX Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureTechnology Distributors
CEOMax Roth LevchinPatrick Zammit
Price69.19 USD140.21 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD11.77 billion USD
Beta3.581.19
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021November 25, 2003
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and SNX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. SNX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SNX

11.37%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
11.37%
Q3
11.14%
Median
9.82%
Q1
7.02%
Min
4.73%

In the upper quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s Return on Equity of 11.37% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

SNX

9.31%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
9.31%
Q3
8.74%
Median
7.43%
Q1
6.70%
Min
5.53%

In the upper quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s Return on Invested Capital of 9.31% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SNX

1.54%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
3.83%
Q3
2.66%
Median
2.26%
Q1
1.49%
Min
1.40%

SNX’s Net Profit Margin of 1.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SNX

2.10%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
3.90%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.86%
Q1
2.76%
Min
2.10%

SNX’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.10% is in the lower quartile for the Technology Distributors industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSNX
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%11.37%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%3.04%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%9.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%1.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%2.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%6.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SNX

1.26

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
3.16
Q3
2.26
Median
1.43
Q1
1.24
Min
1.05

SNX’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SNX

0.05

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
0.60
Q3
0.53
Median
0.15
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SNX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Technology Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SNX

-114.61

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
5.83
Q3
5.83
Median
5.38
Q1
3.31
Min
3.31

SNX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -114.61. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSNX
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.26
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.090.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.05
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.75-0.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.24-114.61

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and SNX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SNX

1.20%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.00%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.20%, SNX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Technology Distributors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SNX

15.36%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
35.81%
Q3
15.47%
Median
13.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.36% is within the typical range for the Technology Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSNX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%15.36%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

SNX

12.57

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
23.75
Q3
21.15
Median
17.13
Q1
14.38
Min
12.09

In the lower quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

SNX

0.98

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.53
Median
0.97
Q1
0.72
Min
0.45

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Technology Distributors industry.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SNX

0.20

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
0.93
Q3
0.55
Median
0.32
Q1
0.22
Min
0.19

In the lower quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s P/S Ratio of 0.20 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

SNX

1.40

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
2.33
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.93

SNX’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is within the conventional range for the Technology Distributors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. SNX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSNX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.5112.57
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.160.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.420.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.801.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6319.45
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0610.34
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.410.19