Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

SAP’s market capitalization of 354.32 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to SAP (beta: 0.94), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SAP is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AFRM, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAFRMSAP
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Sap Se
CountryUSDE
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Application
CEOMax Roth LevchinChristian Klein
Price69.19 USD303.72 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD354.32 billion USD
Beta3.580.94
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021September 18, 1995
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SAP

13.18%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 13.18% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

SAP

11.46%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, SAP’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.46% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SAP

16.31%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.31% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SAP

25.56%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.56% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%13.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%7.58%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%11.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%16.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%25.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%73.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SAP

1.17

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Software - Application industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SAP

--

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for SAP is currently unavailable.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SAP

8.41

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSAP
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.091.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.56--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.71--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.75-1.04
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.248.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and SAP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SAP

0.79%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.79%, SAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software - Application industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SAP

44.75%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.75% is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

SAP

52.02

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 52.02 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

SAP

2.65

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

SAP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.65 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SAP

8.48

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 8.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

SAP

6.52

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

AFRM vs. SAP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.5152.02
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.162.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.428.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.806.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6354.53
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0626.29
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.418.16