Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

RBLX’s market capitalization of 70.26 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RBLX (beta: 1.56), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMRBLX
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Roblox Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEOMax Roth LevchinDavid Baszucki
Price69.19 USD103.59 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD70.26 billion USD
Beta3.581.56
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021March 10, 2021
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RBLX

-417.21%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -417.21%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

RBLX

-27.10%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

RBLX has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -27.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RBLX

-22.94%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.94%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RBLX

-26.48%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -26.48%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%-417.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%-11.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%-27.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%-22.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%-26.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%77.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

RBLX

1.02

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RBLX

5.81

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.81, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RBLX

-25.09

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -25.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMRBLX
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.091.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.565.81
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.24
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.75-1.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.24-25.09

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and RBLX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

RBLX

-79.08

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

RBLX has a negative P/E Ratio of -79.08. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

RBLX

1.72

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

RBLX’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is below the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This is a strong indicator that the stock may be undervalued, as its price appears low given its future growth prospects.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RBLX

18.32

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

With a P/S Ratio of 18.32, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

RBLX

223.95

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

AFRM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.51-79.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.161.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.4218.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.80223.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6380.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.06-115.38
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.4118.49