AFRM vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at AFRM and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Overview
RBLX’s market capitalization of 70.26 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RBLX (beta: 1.56), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
Symbol | AFRM | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Roblox Corporation |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
CEO | Max Roth Levchin | David Baszucki |
Price | 69.19 USD | 103.59 USD |
Market Cap | 22.30 billion USD | 70.26 billion USD |
Beta | 3.58 | 1.56 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | March 10, 2021 |
ADR | No | No |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Profitability
Return on Equity
AFRM
-2.22%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 80.61%
- Q3
- 29.97%
- Median
- 2.84%
- Q1
- -8.35%
- Min
- -56.26%
AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
RBLX
-417.21%
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 22.45%
- Q3
- 13.61%
- Median
- -5.53%
- Q1
- -70.13%
- Min
- -121.78%
RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -417.21%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
Return on Invested Capital
AFRM
-0.85%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 39.31%
- Q3
- 11.97%
- Median
- 1.67%
- Q1
- -7.10%
- Min
- -34.29%
AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.
RBLX
-27.10%
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 17.62%
- Q3
- 11.24%
- Median
- 1.98%
- Q1
- -22.67%
- Min
- -64.64%
RBLX has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -27.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.
Net Profit Margin
AFRM
-2.07%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 46.46%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 2.66%
- Q1
- -7.70%
- Min
- -35.45%
AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
RBLX
-22.94%
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 28.20%
- Q3
- 16.08%
- Median
- 10.20%
- Q1
- -7.35%
- Min
- -22.94%
RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.94%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
Operating Profit Margin
AFRM
-2.53%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 48.51%
- Q3
- 16.56%
- Median
- 4.48%
- Q1
- -6.43%
- Min
- -40.18%
AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
RBLX
-26.48%
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 28.10%
- Q3
- 17.15%
- Median
- 5.89%
- Q1
- -19.43%
- Min
- -26.48%
RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -26.48%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | -2.22% | -417.21% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | -0.60% | -11.81% |
Return on Invested Capital (TTM) | -0.85% | -27.10% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | -2.07% | -22.94% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | -2.53% | -26.48% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 71.61% | 77.92% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio
AFRM
63.09
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 3.80
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.23
AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.
RBLX
1.02
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 3.22
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.19
- Q1
- 0.82
- Min
- 0.01
RBLX’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
AFRM
2.56
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 2.56
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.05
- Min
- 0.00
AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
RBLX
5.81
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 1.92
- Q3
- 1.14
- Median
- 0.31
- Q1
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.09
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.81, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio
AFRM
-0.24
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 32.21
- Q3
- 5.24
- Median
- 0.95
- Q1
- -17.99
- Min
- -50.82
AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
RBLX
-25.09
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 20.61
- Q3
- 4.69
- Median
- -1.31
- Q1
- -20.23
- Min
- -25.09
RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -25.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 1.02 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 1.02 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 5.81 |
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.24 |
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 19.75 | -1.05 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | -25.09 |
Growth
The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and RBLX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.
Revenue Growth
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Free Cash Flow Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield
AFRM
0.00%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 4.07%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
RBLX
0.00%
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 8.44%
- Q3
- 0.36%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio
AFRM
0.00%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 48.68%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
RBLX
0.00%
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 106.44%
- Q3
- 13.31%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio
AFRM
-360.51
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 107.77
- Q3
- 54.40
- Median
- 28.10
- Q1
- 18.03
- Min
- 5.32
AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.
RBLX
-79.08
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 36.87
- Q3
- 20.95
- Median
- 12.73
- Q1
- 7.31
- Min
- 3.67
RBLX has a negative P/E Ratio of -79.08. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.
Forward P/E to Growth Ratio
AFRM
-6.16
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 8.12
- Q3
- 3.94
- Median
- 2.13
- Q1
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.01
AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.
RBLX
1.72
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 2.97
- Q3
- 2.24
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.76
- Min
- 1.76
RBLX’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is below the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This is a strong indicator that the stock may be undervalued, as its price appears low given its future growth prospects.
Price-to-Sales Ratio
AFRM
7.42
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 18.25
- Q3
- 9.05
- Median
- 4.77
- Q1
- 2.30
- Min
- 0.11
AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
RBLX
18.32
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 7.60
- Q3
- 6.29
- Median
- 3.76
- Q1
- 1.02
- Min
- 0.66
With a P/S Ratio of 18.32, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio
AFRM
7.80
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 19.94
- Q3
- 10.91
- Median
- 6.33
- Q1
- 2.95
- Min
- 0.51
The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.
RBLX
223.95
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
- Max
- 6.47
- Q3
- 6.47
- Median
- 4.48
- Q1
- 1.29
- Min
- 0.36
The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -360.51 | -79.08 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -6.16 | 1.72 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.42 | 18.32 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.80 | 223.95 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 36.63 | 80.12 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 93.06 | -115.38 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 9.41 | 18.49 |