AFRM vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and PANW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
PANW stands out with 120.01 billion USD in market value—about 7.88× AFRM’s market cap of 15.24 billion USD.
AFRM’s beta of 3.66 points to much larger expected swings compared to PANW’s calmer 1.02, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AFRM | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Nikesh Arora C.F.A. |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 181.26 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 120.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.66 | 1.02 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | July 20, 2012 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and PANW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and PANW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AFRM posts a negative P/E of -246.14, reflecting last year’s net loss, while PANW at 95.26 signals healthy earnings.
- Analysts assign negative forward PEG ratios to both AFRM (-1.38) and PANW (-0.95), suggesting expectation of shrinking or negative earnings in the upcoming period—a worrying sign for their profit outlook.
| Symbol | AFRM | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | 95.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | -0.95 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 14.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 18.74 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | 40.33 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | 78.26 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 13.85 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | 39.88 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor PANW currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFRM | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and PANW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- PANW’s current ratio of 0.84 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AFRM at 63.09 maintains healthy liquidity.
- With negative EBIT (-0.24), AFRM cannot cover its interest payments. PANW, with an interest coverage of 591.06, meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AFRM | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.14 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | 591.06 |