AFRM vs. OLED: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and OLED, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
AFRM’s market capitalization of 19.07 billion USD is substantially larger than OLED’s 7.30 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.
AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to OLED (beta: 1.51), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
| Symbol | AFRM | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Universal Display Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Steven V. Abramson |
| Price | 59.11 USD | 153.52 USD |
| Market Cap | 19.07 billion USD | 7.30 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.58 | 1.51 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | April 11, 1996 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and OLED over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AFRM and OLED. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- AFRM’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -307.99 is negative, highlighting a lack of current profitability. This situation is a concern for its immediate financial performance and can impact investor confidence.
- AFRM’s Forward PEG ratio of -1.61 is negative. This usually reflects challenges like negative earnings or expectations of future earnings decline, making it difficult to positively interpret its valuation against growth prospects.
| Symbol | AFRM | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -307.99 | 31.81 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.61 | 1.61 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.34 | 11.25 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.66 | 4.40 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 82.44 | 26.40 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.34 | 11.00 |
Dividend Comparison
AFRM currently offers no dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while OLED provides a 0.81% dividend yield, offering investors a component of income return.
| Symbol | AFRM | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.81% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for AFRM and OLED in the table below.
| Symbol | AFRM | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 9.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 7.26 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | -- |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | -- |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 19.75 | -0.58 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | -- |