Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. OKTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and OKTA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMOKTA
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Okta, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization23.54 billion USD15.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021April 7, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and OKTA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. OKTA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMOKTA
5-Day Price Return-4.95%2.73%
13-Week Price Return40.50%-28.01%
26-Week Price Return-2.38%-9.21%
52-Week Price Return159.61%-7.05%
Month-to-Date Return7.73%-6.92%
Year-to-Date Return21.28%15.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.47M2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.45M3.77M
3-Month Volatility52.09%43.53%
Beta3.680.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

-2.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

OKTA

2.05%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

OKTA’s Return on Equity of 2.05% is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-2.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.33%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

OKTA

4.85%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

OKTA’s Net Profit Margin of 4.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-5.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

OKTA

1.16%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

OKTA’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.16% is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMOKTA
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%2.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.61%1.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.33%4.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.22%1.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--76.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

OKTA

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

OKTA’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

OKTA

0.13

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, OKTA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

OKTA

-9.31

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

OKTA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMOKTA
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.491.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.411.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.490.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.76-9.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. OKTA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. OKTA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

OKTA

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OKTA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

OKTA

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OKTA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMOKTA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for AFRM is currently unavailable.

OKTA

122.61

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

At 122.61, OKTA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the IT Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

8.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

OKTA

5.95

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

OKTA’s P/S Ratio of 5.95 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

5.03

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 5.03 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

OKTA

2.97

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

OKTA’s P/B Ratio of 2.97 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMOKTA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--122.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.815.95
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.032.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.6821.14