AFRM vs. OKTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and OKTA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AFRM at 15.24 billion USD and OKTA at 20.40 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
AFRM’s beta of 3.66 points to much larger expected swings compared to OKTA’s calmer 0.96, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AFRM | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Okta, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Todd McKinnon |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 122.06 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 20.40 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.66 | 0.96 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | April 7, 2017 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and OKTA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and OKTA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AFRM has a negative P/E (-246.14) due to recent losses. In contrast, OKTA commands a premium multiple of 749.52, signaling strong market confidence in its future earnings growth to justify this high valuation.
- AFRM posts a negative forward PEG of -1.38, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas OKTA at 86.90 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | AFRM | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | 749.52 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | 86.90 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 7.82 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 3.28 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | 27.80 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | 337.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 8.03 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | 28.54 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor OKTA currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFRM | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and OKTA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- Both AFRM and OKTA report negative interest coverage ratios (-0.24, -37.00), meaning EBIT itself is negative—neither can cover interest, a critical solvency warning.
| Symbol | AFRM | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 1.35 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 1.35 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.15 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | -37.00 |