AFRM vs. NVDA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and NVDA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
NVDA stands out with 3,214.29 billion USD in market value—about 210.92× AFRM’s market cap of 15.24 billion USD.
AFRM’s beta of 3.66 points to much larger expected swings compared to NVDA’s calmer 2.11, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AFRM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | NVIDIA Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Jen-Hsun Huang |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 131.8 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 3,214.29 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.66 | 2.11 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | January 22, 1999 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and NVDA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and NVDA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AFRM posts a negative P/E of -246.14, reflecting last year’s net loss, while NVDA at 44.29 signals healthy earnings.
- AFRM posts a negative forward PEG of -1.38, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas NVDA at 3.64 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | AFRM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | 44.29 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | 3.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 24.63 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 40.69 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | 52.82 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | 37.34 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 24.64 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | 52.85 |
Dividend Comparison
AFRM offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while NVDA provides a 0.03% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AFRM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and NVDA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With negative EBIT (-0.24), AFRM cannot cover its interest payments. NVDA, with an interest coverage of 329.77, meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AFRM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 4.44 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 3.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.09 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | 329.77 |