Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFRM’s market capitalization stands at 22.30 billion USD, while NTAP’s is 21.49 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to NTAP (beta: 1.41), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMNTAP
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureComputer Hardware
CEOMax Roth LevchinGeorge Kurian
Price69.19 USD107.26 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD21.49 billion USD
Beta3.581.41
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021November 21, 1995
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTAP

123.03%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

NTAP

16.49%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

NTAP’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.49% is in line with the norm for the Computer Hardware industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTAP

18.05%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.05% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NTAP

20.34%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%123.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%10.96%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%16.49%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%18.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%20.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%70.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NTAP

1.26

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTAP

3.36

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.36, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Computer Hardware industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NTAP

31.09

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.09 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMNTAP
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.26
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.091.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.563.36
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.32
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.750.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.2431.09

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and NTAP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP

1.94%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.94%, NTAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP

35.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.94%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

NTAP

18.36

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.36 is within the middle range for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

NTAP

2.15

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTAP

3.27

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

NTAP

20.94

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

NTAP’s P/B Ratio of 20.94 is in the upper tier for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AFRM vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.5118.36
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.162.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.423.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.8020.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6316.06
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0613.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.413.38