AFRM vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at AFRM and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Overview
AFRM’s market capitalization stands at 22.30 billion USD, while NTAP’s is 21.49 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.
AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to NTAP (beta: 1.41), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
Symbol | AFRM | NTAP |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | NetApp, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Computer Hardware |
CEO | Max Roth Levchin | George Kurian |
Price | 69.19 USD | 107.26 USD |
Market Cap | 22.30 billion USD | 21.49 billion USD |
Beta | 3.58 | 1.41 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | November 21, 1995 |
ADR | No | No |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Profitability
Return on Equity
AFRM
-2.22%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 80.61%
- Q3
- 29.97%
- Median
- 2.84%
- Q1
- -8.35%
- Min
- -56.26%
AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
NTAP
123.03%
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 123.03%
- Q3
- 15.78%
- Median
- -13.44%
- Q1
- -119.16%
- Min
- -227.95%
In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Return on Invested Capital
AFRM
-0.85%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 39.31%
- Q3
- 11.97%
- Median
- 1.67%
- Q1
- -7.10%
- Min
- -34.29%
AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.
NTAP
16.49%
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 30.37%
- Q3
- 20.44%
- Median
- 7.03%
- Q1
- -12.47%
- Min
- -31.70%
NTAP’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.49% is in line with the norm for the Computer Hardware industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.
Net Profit Margin
AFRM
-2.07%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 46.46%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 2.66%
- Q1
- -7.70%
- Min
- -35.45%
AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
NTAP
18.05%
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 40.72%
- Q3
- 10.87%
- Median
- 4.33%
- Q1
- -378.64%
- Min
- -753.20%
A Net Profit Margin of 18.05% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin
AFRM
-2.53%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 48.51%
- Q3
- 16.56%
- Median
- 4.48%
- Q1
- -6.43%
- Min
- -40.18%
AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
NTAP
20.34%
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 42.27%
- Q3
- 13.53%
- Median
- 4.56%
- Q1
- -295.01%
- Min
- -592.84%
An Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | NTAP |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | -2.22% | 123.03% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | -0.60% | 10.96% |
Return on Invested Capital (TTM) | -0.85% | 16.49% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | -2.07% | 18.05% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | -2.53% | 20.34% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 71.61% | 70.19% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio
AFRM
63.09
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 3.80
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.23
AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.
NTAP
1.26
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 20.73
- Q3
- 11.54
- Median
- 2.69
- Q1
- 1.40
- Min
- 0.73
NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
AFRM
2.56
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 2.56
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.05
- Min
- 0.00
AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
NTAP
3.36
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 1.36
- Q3
- 0.67
- Median
- 0.04
- Q1
- 0.03
- Min
- 0.00
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.36, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Computer Hardware industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio
AFRM
-0.24
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 32.21
- Q3
- 5.24
- Median
- 0.95
- Q1
- -17.99
- Min
- -50.82
AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
NTAP
31.09
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 32.50
- Q3
- 21.85
- Median
- 4.98
- Q1
- -7.71
- Min
- -34.24
NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.09 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | NTAP |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 1.26 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 1.22 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 3.36 |
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.32 |
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 19.75 | 0.47 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | 31.09 |
Growth
The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and NTAP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.
Revenue Growth
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Free Cash Flow Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield
AFRM
0.00%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 4.07%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
NTAP
1.94%
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 9.24%
- Q3
- 1.58%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 1.94%, NTAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
Dividend Payout Ratio
AFRM
0.00%
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 48.68%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
NTAP
35.75%
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 193.79%
- Q3
- 30.72%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | NTAP |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.94% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 35.75% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio
AFRM
-360.51
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 107.77
- Q3
- 54.40
- Median
- 28.10
- Q1
- 18.03
- Min
- 5.32
AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.
NTAP
18.36
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 24.60
- Q3
- 24.01
- Median
- 20.31
- Q1
- 18.24
- Min
- 13.38
NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.36 is within the middle range for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Forward P/E to Growth Ratio
AFRM
-6.16
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 8.12
- Q3
- 3.94
- Median
- 2.13
- Q1
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.01
AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.
NTAP
2.15
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 9.77
- Q3
- 5.18
- Median
- 1.77
- Q1
- 1.17
- Min
- 0.02
The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.
Price-to-Sales Ratio
AFRM
7.42
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 18.25
- Q3
- 9.05
- Median
- 4.77
- Q1
- 2.30
- Min
- 0.11
AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
NTAP
3.27
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 57.61
- Q3
- 47.40
- Median
- 3.37
- Q1
- 1.56
- Min
- 0.43
NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio
AFRM
7.80
Software - Infrastructure Industry
- Max
- 19.94
- Q3
- 10.91
- Median
- 6.33
- Q1
- 2.95
- Min
- 0.51
The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.
NTAP
20.94
Computer Hardware Industry
- Max
- 21.21
- Q3
- 14.71
- Median
- 9.28
- Q1
- 3.74
- Min
- 0.43
NTAP’s P/B Ratio of 20.94 is in the upper tier for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | AFRM | NTAP |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -360.51 | 18.36 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -6.16 | 2.15 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.42 | 3.27 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.80 | 20.94 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 36.63 | 16.06 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 93.06 | 13.94 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 9.41 | 3.38 |