AFRM vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and MRVL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MRVL’s market capitalization of 64.82 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to MRVL (beta: 1.76), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Symbol	AFRM	MRVL
Company Name	Affirm Holdings, Inc.	Marvell Technology, Inc.
Country	US	US
Sector	Technology	Technology
Industry	Software - Infrastructure	Semiconductors
CEO	Max Roth Levchin	Matthew J. Murphy
Price	69.19 USD	75.18 USD
Market Cap	22.30 billion USD	64.82 billion USD
Beta	3.58	1.76
Exchange	NASDAQ	NASDAQ
IPO Date	January 13, 2021	June 30, 2000
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and MRVL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. MRVL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 80.61%
Q3: 29.97%
Median: 2.84%
Q1: -8.35%
Min: -56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MRVL

-3.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 41.84%
Q3: 15.81%
Median: 6.31%
Q1: -5.54%
Min: -30.12%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -3.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 39.31%
Q3: 11.97%
Median: 1.67%
Q1: -7.10%
Min: -34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

MRVL

0.22%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 30.91%
Q3: 11.34%
Median: 4.08%
Q1: -2.17%
Min: -19.59%

MRVL’s Return on Invested Capital of 0.22% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 46.46%
Q3: 14.65%
Median: 2.66%
Q1: -7.70%
Min: -35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MRVL

-7.56%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 51.69%
Q3: 19.67%
Median: 8.56%
Q1: -5.44%
Min: -38.60%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.56%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 48.51%
Q3: 16.56%
Median: 4.48%
Q1: -6.43%
Min: -40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MRVL

0.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 58.03%
Q3: 22.12%
Median: 8.40%
Q1: -3.73%
Min: -36.14%

MRVL’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.62% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	MRVL
Return on Equity (TTM)	-2.22%	-3.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-0.60%	-2.45%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	-0.85%	0.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-2.07%	-7.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-2.53%	0.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	71.61%	43.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.80
Q3: 2.25
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MRVL

1.30

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 9.10
Q3: 5.23
Median: 3.09
Q1: 2.49
Min: 1.02

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 2.56
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.33
Q1: 0.05
Min: 0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MRVL

0.34

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 0.97
Q3: 0.46
Median: 0.21
Q1: 0.05
Min: 0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 32.21
Q3: 5.24
Median: 0.95
Q1: -17.99
Min: -50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MRVL

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 36.25
Q3: 29.12
Median: 7.01
Q1: -1.22
Min: -18.18

MRVL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.21 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	MRVL
Current Ratio (TTM)	63.09	1.30
Quick Ratio (TTM)	63.09	0.94
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	2.56	0.34
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.71	0.23
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	19.75	3.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-0.24	0.21

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and MRVL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.07%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MRVL

0.32%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 6.48%
Q3: 0.93%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 48.68%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MRVL

-42.22%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 204.29%
Q3: 31.85%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MRVL has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -42.22%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	MRVL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	-42.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 107.77
Q3: 54.40
Median: 28.10
Q1: 18.03
Min: 5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MRVL

-132.28

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 86.15
Q3: 47.38
Median: 27.87
Q1: 18.89
Min: 4.73

MRVL has a negative P/E Ratio of -132.28. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 8.12
Q3: 3.94
Median: 2.13
Q1: 0.94
Min: 0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

MRVL

-8.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 4.73
Q3: 2.80
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 18.25
Q3: 9.05
Median: 4.77
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MRVL

9.97

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 21.96
Q3: 10.21
Median: 4.45
Q1: 2.32
Min: 0.48

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 9.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max: 19.94
Q3: 10.91
Median: 6.33
Q1: 2.95
Min: 0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

MRVL

4.88

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 13.12
Q3: 6.49
Median: 3.31
Q1: 1.74
Min: 0.23

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.88 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. MRVL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	MRVL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	-360.51	-132.28
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	-6.16	-8.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	7.42	9.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	7.80	4.88
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	36.63	47.25
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	93.06	64.72
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	9.41	10.53